Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27587921›Full record

ArticleSeminars in hearing2016

Clinical Experience of Using Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in the Treatment of Infant Hearing Loss in Australia.

Simone Punch, Bram Van Dun, Alison King, Lyndal Carter, Wendy Pearce

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Seminars in hearing, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03887182 (Contribution of Functional MRI in Assessment of Auditory Processing Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03887182 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Contribution of Functional MRI in Assessment of Auditory Processing Disorders

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2020 to 2023Enrolled45ConditionsAuditory Processing DisordersArmsfunctional MRI, Automated Cortical Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential, whole exome sequencing, Standard Cortical Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential, multidisciplinary consultation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simone PunchAustralian Hearing, Sydney, Australia.
Bram Van DunThe HEARing CRC, Melbourne, Australia; National Acoustic Laboratories, Sydney, Australia.
Alison KingAustralian Hearing, Sydney, Australia.
Lyndal CarterThe HEARing CRC, Melbourne, Australia; National Acoustic Laboratories, Sydney, Australia.
Wendy PearceAustralian Hearing, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article presents the clinical protocol that is currently being used within Australian Hearing for infant hearing aid evaluation using cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs). CAEP testing is performed in the free field at two stimulus levels (65 dB sound pressure level [SPL], followed by 55 or 75 dB SPL) using three brief frequency-distinct speech sounds /m/, /ɡ/, and /t/, within a standard audiological appointment of up to 90 minutes. CAEP results are used to check or guide modifications of hearing aid fittings or to confirm unaided hearing capability. A retrospective review of 83 client files evaluated whether clinical practice aligned with the clinical protocol. It showed that most children could be assessed as part of their initial fitting program when they were identified as a priority for CAEP testing. Aided CAEPs were most commonly assessed within 8 weeks of the fitting. A survey of 32 pediatric audiologists provided information about their perception of cortical testing at Australian Hearing. The results indicated that clinical CAEP testing influenced audiologists' approach to rehabilitation and was well received by parents and that they were satisfied with the technique. Three case studies were selected to illustrate how CAEP testing can be used in a clinical environment. Overall, CAEP testing has been effectively integrated into the infant fitting program.

Indexed as

Cortical auditory evoked potentialhearinghearing aidinfant

Identifiers

PMID27587921
PMCPMC4910569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.