ArticleBMC systems biology2016
Classification of breast cancer patients using somatic mutation profiles and machine learning approaches.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.
- Monte Carlo Tree Search for optimal cancer intervention strategies among BRCA mutation carriers.Computers in biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Association Between Primary Dysmenorrhea and Mental Health Traits: A Study Based on Multi-Phenotype Correlation Network and Mendelian Randomization Analysis in Female College Students.Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A review of the use of tumour DNA methylation for breast cancer subtyping and prediction of outcomes.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Review
- DNA Molecular Computing with Weighted Signal Amplification for Cancer miRNA Biomarker Diagnostics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Explainable AI Model Reveals Informative Mutational Signatures for Cancer-Type Classification.Cancers · 2025Article
- Deep Reinforcement Learning for CT-Based Non-Invasive Prediction of SOX9 Expression in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Neural network prediction model based on Levy flight and natural biomimetic technology for its application in cancer prediction.PloS one · 2025Article
- Exploring the Role of Clustered Mutations in Carcinogenesis and Their Potential Clinical Implications in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- GFPrint™: A machine learning tool for transforming genetic data into clinical insights.PloS one · 2024Article
- Mitochondrial-related genes as prognostic and metastatic markers in breast cancer: insights from comprehensive analysis and clinical models.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Integrating somatic mutation profiles with structural deep clustering network for metabolic stratification in pancreatic cancer: a comprehensive analysis of prognostic and genomic landscapes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Recurrence prediction of lung adenocarcinoma using an immune gene expression and clinical data trained and validated support vector machine classifier.Translational lung cancer research · 2023Article
- Review
- Mendelian randomization and transcriptomic analysis reveal an inverse causal relationship between Alzheimer's disease and cancer.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Molecular Characterization and Landscape of Breast cancer Models from a multi-omics Perspective.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2023Review
- SUPREME: multiomics data integration using graph convolutional networks.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Familial CCM Genes Might Not Be Main Drivers for Pathogenesis of Sporadic CCMs-Genetic Similarity between Cancers and Vascular Malformations.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Computational Methods Summarizing Mutational Patterns in Cancer: Promise and Limitations for Clinical Applications.Cancers · 2023Review
- Integration of multi-omics data reveals a novel hybrid breast cancer subtype and its biomarkers.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Deep learning and multi-omics approach to predict drug responses in cancer.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe high degree of heterogeneity observed in breast cancers makes it very difficult to classify the cancer patients into distinct clinical subgroups and consequently limits the ability to devise effective therapeutic strategies. Several classification strategies based on ER/PR/HER2 expression or the expression profiles of a panel of genes have helped, but such methods often produce misleading results due to their dynamic nature. In contrast, somatic DNA mutations are relatively stable and lead to initiation and progression of many sporadic cancers. Hence in this study, we explore the use of gene mutation profiles to classify, characterize and predict the subgroups of breast cancers.
resultsWe analyzed the whole exome sequencing data from 358 ethnically similar breast cancer patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project. Somatic and non-synonymous single nucleotide variants identified from each patient were assigned a quantitative score (C-score) that represents the extent of negative impact on the gene function. Using these scores with non-negative matrix factorization method, we clustered the patients into three subgroups. By comparing the clinical stage of patients, we identified an early-stage-enriched and a late-stage-enriched subgroup. Comparison of the mutation scores of early and late-stage-enriched subgroups identified 358 genes that carry significantly higher mutations rates in the late stage subgroup. Functional characterization of these genes revealed important functional gene families that carry a heavy mutational load in the late state rich subgroup of patients. Finally, using the identified subgroups, we also developed a supervised classification model to predict the stage of the patients.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that gene mutation profiles can be effectively used with unsupervised machine-learning methods to identify clinically distinguishable breast cancer subgroups. The classification model developed in this method could provide a reasonable prediction of the cancer patients' stage solely based on their mutation profiles. This study represents the first use of only somatic mutation profile data to identify and predict breast cancer subgroups and this generic methodology can also be applied to other cancer datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.