ArticleIntensive care medicine2017
Evidence supports the superiority of closed ICUs for patients and families: Yes.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Article
- A closed surgical intensive care unit organization improves cardiac surgical patient outcomes.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Critical care practices in the world: Results of the global intensive care unit need assessment survey 2020.World journal of critical care medicine · 2022Article
- The Status of Quality Improvement Programs for Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Care in Argentina.The Journal of surgical research · 2021Article
- The association between self-declared acute care surgery services and critical care resources: Results from a national survey.Journal of critical care · 2020Article
- Did KDIGO guidelines on acute kidney injury improve patient outcome?Intensive care medicine · 2017Article
- Evidence supports the superiority of closed ICUs for patients and families: we are not sure.Intensive care medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27586991What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.