ArticleBMC cancer2016
Promoter hypermethylation of HS3ST2, SEPTIN9 and SLIT2 combined with FGFR3 mutations as a sensitive/specific urinary assay for diagnosis and surveillance in patients with low or high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Active Surveillance in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer, the Potential Role of Biomarkers: A Systematic Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Pooled it
- Urinary biomarkers for bladder cancer diagnosis and NMIBC follow-up: a systematic review.World journal of urology · 2023Pooled it
- Current status of genetic urinary biomarkers for surveillance of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review.BMC urology · 2020Pooled it
- Liquid biopsy in the clinical management of tumor of urinary system: current status and future developments.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026Review
- Review
- Urinary biomarkers in multicentric studies: Shaping the future of bladder cancer diagnosis and follow-up.BJUI compass · 2025Review
- SEPT9 methylation as a diagnostic and predictive biomarker in the progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- DNA Methylation in Urine and Feces Indicative of Eight Major Human Cancer Types Globally.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Epigenetic Biomarkers as a New Diagnostic Tool in Bladder Cancer-From Early Detection to Prognosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Review
- A prospective study of smoking-related white blood cell DNA methylation markers and risk of bladder cancer.European journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- A novel screening method of DNA methylation biomarkers helps to improve the detection of colorectal cancer and precancerous lesions.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- The Role of Novel Bladder Cancer Diagnostic and Surveillance Biomarkers-What Should a Urologist Really Know?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Bladder cancer detection in patients with neurogenic bladder: are cystoscopy and cytology effective, and are biomarkers pertinent as future diagnostic tools? A scoping review.World journal of urology · 2022Article
- A novel and sensitive DNA methylation marker for the urine-based liquid biopsies to detect bladder cancer.BMC cancer · 2022Article
- Detecting and monitoring bladder cancer with exfoliated cells in urine.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Prominence of urinary biomarkers for bladder cancer in the COVID-19 era: From the commercially available to new prospective candidates.Investigative and clinical urology · 2021Review
- Tumoral markers in bladder cancer (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Review
- Trends in urine biomarker discovery for urothelial bladder cancer: DNA, RNA, or protein?Translational andrology and urology · 2021Review
- Toward urinary cell-free DNA-based treatment of urothelial carcinoma: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a high incidence form of bladder cancer (BCa), where genetic and epigenetic alterations occur frequently. We assessed the performance of associating a FGFR3 mutation assay and a DNA methylation analysis to improve bladder cancer detection and to predict disease recurrence of NMIBC patients.
methodsWe used allele specific PCR to determine the FGFR3 mutation status for R248C, S249C, G372C, and Y375C. We preselected 18 candidate genes reported in the literature as being hypermethylated in cancer and measured their methylation levels by quantitative multiplex-methylation specific PCR. We selected HS3ST2, SLIT2 and SEPTIN9 as the most discriminative between control and NMIBC patients and we assayed these markers on urine DNA from a diagnostic study consisting of 167 NMIBC and 105 controls and a follow-up study consisting of 158 NMIBC at diagnosis time's and 425 at follow-up time. ROC analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of each assay alone and in combination.
resultsFor Diagnosis: Using a logistic regression analysis with a model consisting of the 3 markers' methylation values, FGFR3 status, age and known smoker status at the diagnosis time we obtained sensitivity/specificity of 97.6 %/84.8 % and an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.96. With an estimated BCa prevalence of 12.1 % in a hematuria cohort, this corresponds to a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.6 %. For Follow-up: Using a logistic regression with FGFR3 mutation and the CMI at two time points (beginning of the follow-up and current time point), we got sensitivity/specificity/NPV of 90.3 %/65.1 %/97.0 % and a corrected AUC of 0.84. We also tested a thresholding algorithm with FGFR3 mutation and the two time points as described above, obtaining sensitivity/specificity/NPV values of, respectively, 94.5 %/75.9 %/98.5 % and an AUC of 0.82.
conclusionsWe showed that combined analysis of FGFR3 mutation and DNA methylation markers on urine can be a useful strategy in diagnosis, surveillance and for risk stratification of patients with NMIBC. These results provide the basis for a highly accurate noninvasive test for population screening and allowing to decrease the frequency of cystoscopy, an important feature for both patient quality of life improvement and care cost reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.