Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27586609›Full record

ArticleChaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)2016

Detecting causality in policy diffusion processes.

Carsten Grabow, James Macinko, Diana Silver, Maurizio Porfiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carsten GrabowDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, New York University, Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, New York 11201, USA.
James MacinkoDepartment of Community Health Sciences and Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, 650 Charles Young Dr., Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
Diana SilverDepartment of Nutrition, Food Studies, and Public Health, 411 Lafayette Street, New York University, Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development, New York, New York 10003, USA.
Maurizio PorfiriDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, New York University, Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, New York 11201, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A universal question in network science entails learning about the topology of interaction from collective dynamics. Here, we address this question by examining diffusion of laws across US states. We propose two complementary techniques to unravel determinants of this diffusion process: information-theoretic union transfer entropy and event synchronization. In order to systematically investigate their performance on law activity data, we establish a new stochastic model to generate synthetic law activity data based on plausible networks of interactions. Through extensive parametric studies, we demonstrate the ability of these methods to reconstruct networks, varying in size, link density, and degree heterogeneity. Our results suggest that union transfer entropy should be preferred for slowly varying processes, which may be associated with policies attending to specific local problems that occur only rarely or with policies facing high levels of opposition. In contrast, event synchronization is effective for faster enactment rates, which may be related to policies involving Federal mandates or incentives. This study puts forward a data-driven toolbox to explain the determinants of legal activity applicable to political science, across dynamical systems, information theory, and complex networks.

Indexed as

CausalityPolicyArea Under CurveComputer SimulationEntropyNonlinear DynamicsROC CurveUnited States

Identifiers

PMID27586609
PMCPMC4991992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.