Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27586539›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in behavioral neurosciences2018

The Discriminative Stimulus Properties of Hallucinogenic and Dissociative Anesthetic Drugs.

Tomohisa Mori, Tsutomu Suzuki

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tomohisa MoriDepartment of Toxicology, Hoshi University School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hoshi, Japan.
Tsutomu SuzukiDepartment of Toxicology, Hoshi University School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hoshi, Japan. suzuki@hoshi.ac.jp.
Hoshi University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The subjective effects of drugs are related to the kinds of feelings they produce, such as euphoria or dysphoria. One of the methods that can be used to study these effects is the drug discrimination procedure. Many researchers have been trying to elucidate the mechanisms that underlie the discriminative stimulus properties of abused drugs (e.g., alcohol, psychostimulants, and opioids). Over the past two decades, patterns of drug abuse have changed, so that club/recreational drugs such as phencyclidine (PCP), 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), ketamine, and cannabinoid, which induce perceptual distortions, like hallucinations, are now more commonly abused, especially in younger generations. In particular, the abuse of designer drugs, which aim to mimic the subjective effects of psychostimulants (e.g., MDMA or amphetamines), has been problematic. However, the mechanisms of the discriminative stimulus effects of hallucinogenic and dissociative anesthetic drugs are not yet fully clear. This chapter focuses on recent findings regarding hallucinogenic and dissociative anesthetic drug-induced discriminative stimulus properties in animals.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, DissociativeAnimalsDiscrimination, PsychologicalHallucinogensHumansAnesthetics, DissociativeHallucinogensDiscriminative stimulus propertiesHallucinogensPsychedelicsSerotoninSigma-1 receptor

Identifiers

PMID27586539
OpenAlexW2518557383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.