Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27586507›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy2016

Using respondent-driven sampling (RDS) to recruit illegal poly-substance users in Cape Town, South Africa: implications and future directions.

Nadine Harker Burnhams, Ria Laubscher, Simon Howell, Mark Shaw, Jodilee Erasmus, Loraine Townsend

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nadine Harker BurnhamsAlcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, P.O. Box 19070, Tygerberg, 7505, Cape Town, South Africa. nadine.harker@mrc.ac.za.
Ria LaubscherBiostatistics Unit, South African Medical Research Council, P.O. Box 19070, Tygerberg, Cape Town, 7505, South Africa.
Simon HowellCentre for Criminology, University of Cape Town Rondebosch, Private Bag x3, Cape Town, 7701, South Africa.
Mark ShawCentre for Criminology, University of Cape Town Rondebosch, Private Bag x3, Cape Town, 7701, South Africa.
Jodilee ErasmusAlcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, P.O. Box 19070, Tygerberg, 7505, Cape Town, South Africa.
Loraine TownsendHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, P.O. Box 19070, Tygerberg, Cape Town, 7505, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSouth Africa continues to witness an increase in illicit poly-substance use, although a precise measurement continues to be compounded by difficulties in accessing users. In a pilot attempt to use respondent-driven sampling (RDS)-a chain referral sampling method used to access populations of individuals who are 'hard-to-reach'-this article documents the feasibility of the method as recorded in a simultaneously run, multisite, poly-substance study in Cape Town. Here we aim to a) document the piloting of RDS among poly-substance users in the three socio-economic disparate communities targeted; b) briefly document the results; and c) review the utility of RDS as a research tool.

methodsThree cross-sectional surveys using standard RDS procedures were used to recruit active poly-substance users and were concurrently deployed in three sites. Formative research was initially conducted to assess the feasibility of the survey. To determine whether RDS could be used to successfully recruit poly-substance users, social network characteristics, such as network size was determined.

resultsA 42.5 % coupon return rate was recorded in total from 12 initial seeds. There were vast differences in the recruitment chains of individual seeds-two generated more than 90 recruits, and 2 of the 10 recruitment chains showing a length of more than 10 waves. Findings include evidence of the use of 3 or more substances in all three sites, high levels of unemployment among users, with more than a third of participants in two sites reporting arrest for drug use in the past 12 months.

conclusionsOur results indicate that RDS was a feasible and acceptable sampling method for recruiting participants who may not otherwise be accessible. Future studies can use RDS to recruit such cohorts, and the method could form part of broader efforts to document vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultCrimeCross-Sectional StudiesDrug UsersFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsSocial SupportSouth AfricaUnemploymentYoung AdultIllicit DrugsPoly-substancesRespondent-driven samplingSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID27586507
PMCPMC5007993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.