ArticleJournal of veterinary science2017
Survey of porcine respiratory disease complex-associated pathogens among commercial pig farms in Korea via oral fluid method.
Article in Journal of veterinary science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current prevalence and therapeutic strategies for porcineApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025Review
- Field study on the suitability of oral fluid samples for monitoring of Lawsonia intracellularis and Brachyspira hyodysenteriae by multiplex qPCR under field conditions.Porcine health management · 2025Article
- Gut microbiome perturbation and its correlation with tylosin pharmacokinetics in healthy and infected pigs.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Transcriptome sequencing reveals non-coding RNAs respond to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus andJournal of animal science and technology · 2024Article
- Prevalence and Genetic Characterization of Porcine Respiratory Coronavirus in Korean Pig Farms.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Metagenomics to Identify Viral Communities Associated with Porcine Respiratory Disease Complex in Tibetan Pigs in the Tibetan Plateau, China.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Gentamicin CAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Finding biomarkers of experience in animals.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Automatic Monitoring of Respiratory Health Conditions in Smart Swine Farming.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Modeling Co-Infection byAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Assessment of the Macrophage Scavenger Receptor CD163 in MediatingVeterinary sciences · 2023Article
- Optimizing tylosin dosage for co-infection ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Detection of Porcine Circovirus Type 2a andVeterinary sciences · 2022Article
- Virulence and Inoculation Route Influence the Consequences ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2022Article
- First Study to Describe the Prevalence of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus and Porcine Circovirus Type 2 among the Farmed Pig Population in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.Veterinary sciences · 2022Article
- Comparison of PK/PD Targets and Cutoff Values for Danofloxacin AgainstFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Porcine respiratory disease complex: Dynamics of polymicrobial infections and management strategies after the introduction of the African swine fever.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Review
- An epidemiological study ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021Article
- Co-infection analysis of bacterial and viral respiratory pathogens from clinically healthy swine in Eastern China.Veterinary medicine and science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral fluid analysis for herd monitoring is of interest to the commercial pig production in Korea. The aim of this study was to investigate pathogen-positive rates and correlations among eight pathogens associated with porcine respiratory disease complex by analyzing oral fluid samples from 214 pig groups from 56 commercial farms. Samples collected by a rope-chewing method underwent reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis, depending on the microorganism. Pathogens were divided into virus and bacteria groups. The former consisted of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2), and the latter
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.