ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016
Clustering analysis of proteins from microbial genomes at multiple levels of resolution.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- VICatMix: variational Bayesian clustering and variable selection for discrete biomedical data.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Comparative genomics reveals distinct diversification patterns among LysR-type transcriptional regulators in the ESKAPE pathogenMicrobial genomics · 2024Article
- Characterization of 29 newly isolated bacteriophages as a potential therapeutic agent against IMP-6-producingMicrobiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Exploring microbial functional biodiversity at the protein family level-From metagenomic sequence reads to annotated protein clusters.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2023Review
- AMarine drugs · 2021Article
- Study on Gas Chromatographic Fingerprint of Essential Oil fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- PCA via joint graph Laplacian and sparse constraint: Identification of differentially expressed genes and sample clustering on gene expression data.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- The metaRbolomics Toolbox in Bioconductor and beyond.Metabolites · 2019Review
- GGRaSP: a R-package for selecting representative genomes using Gaussian mixture models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline.Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicrobial genomes at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) represent a large collection of more than 35,000 assemblies. There are several complexities associated with the data: a great variation in sampling density since human pathogens are densely sampled while other bacteria are less represented; different protein families occur in annotations with different frequencies; and the quality of genome annotation varies greatly. In order to extract useful information from these sophisticated data, the analysis needs to be performed at multiple levels of phylogenomic resolution and protein similarity, with an adequate sampling strategy.
resultsProtein clustering is used to construct meaningful and stable groups of similar proteins to be used for analysis and functional annotation. Our approach is to create protein clusters at three levels. First, tight clusters in groups of closely-related genomes (species-level clades) are constructed using a combined approach that takes into account both sequence similarity and genome context. Second, clustroids of conservative in-clade clusters are organized into seed global clusters. Finally, global protein clusters are built around the the seed clusters. We propose filtering strategies that allow limiting the protein set included in global clustering. The in-clade clustering procedure, subsequent selection of clustroids and organization into seed global clusters provides a robust representation and high rate of compression. Seed protein clusters are further extended by adding related proteins. Extended seed clusters include a significant part of the data and represent all major known cell machinery. The remaining part, coming from either non-conservative (unique) or rapidly evolving proteins, from rare genomes, or resulting from low-quality annotation, does not group together well. Processing these proteins requires significant computational resources and results in a large number of questionable clusters.
conclusionThe developed filtering strategies allow to identify and exclude such peripheral proteins limiting the protein dataset in global clustering. Overall, the proposed methodology allows the relevant data at different levels of details to be obtained and data redundancy eliminated while keeping biologically interesting variations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.