Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27586328›Full record

ArticleMethods in enzymology2016

Protein and Antibody Engineering by Phage Display.

J C Frei, J R Lai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in enzymology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mapping SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Function with Nanobodies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. T7 Phage as an Emerging Nanobiomaterial with Genetically Tunable Target Specificity.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Many Applications of Engineered Bacteriophages-An Overview.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J C FreiAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.
J R LaiAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States. Electronic address: jon.lai@einstein.yu.edu.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

Mechanistic Virology CoreU19AI109762 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI LAI, JONATHAN R. · 2014 to 2018
$29.6M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI109762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phage display is an in vitro selection technique that allows for the rapid isolation of proteins with desired properties including increased affinity, specificity, stability, and new enzymatic activity. The power of phage display relies on the phenotype-to-genotype linkage of the protein of interest displayed on the phage surface with the encoding DNA packaged within the phage particle, which allows for selective enrichment of library pools and high-throughput screening of resulting clones. As an in vitro method, the conditions of the binding selection can be tightly controlled. Due to the high-throughput nature, rapidity, and ease of use, phage display is an excellent technological platform for engineering antibody or proteins with enhanced properties. Here, we describe methods for synthesis, selection, and screening of phage libraries with particular emphasis on designing humanizing antibody libraries and combinatorial scanning mutagenesis libraries. We conclude with a brief section on troubleshooting for all stages of the phage display process.

Indexed as

Genetic TechniquesAntibodiesBacteriophagesCloning, MolecularPeptide LibraryProtein EngineeringAntibodiesPeptide LibraryAntibody engineeringCombinatorial biochemistryCombinatorial scanning mutagenesisPhage displayProtein engineering

Identifiers

PMID27586328
PMCPMC5618251
OpenAlexW2514810313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.