Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27586201›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2017

Genetic analysis of uterine aspirates improves the diagnostic value and captures the intra-tumor heterogeneity of endometrial cancers.

Alba Mota, Eva Colás, Pablo García-Sanz, Irene Campoy, Alejandro Rojo-Sebastián, Sonia Gatius, Ángel García, Luis Chiva, Sonsoles Alonso, Antonio Gil-Moreno and 10 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Improving response to progestin treatment of low-grade endometrial cancer.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Alba MotaDepartamento de Bioquímica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas 'Alberto Sols' (CSIC-UAM), IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9148-3965
Eva ColásDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLLEIDA, Lleida, Spain.
Pablo García-SanzDepartamento de Bioquímica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas 'Alberto Sols' (CSIC-UAM), IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
Irene CampoyBiomedical Research Group in Gynaecology, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute and Hospital, and Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Alejandro Rojo-SebastiánMD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Sonia GatiusDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLLEIDA, Lleida, Spain.
Ángel GarcíaDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Vall Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Luis ChivaMD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Sonsoles AlonsoMD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Antonio Gil-MorenoBiomedical Research Group in Gynaecology, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute and Hospital, and Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Xavier González-TalladaDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLLEIDA, Lleida, Spain.
Berta Díaz-FeijooBiomedical Research Group in Gynaecology, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute and Hospital, and Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
August VidalHospital Universati de Bellvitge, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain.
Patrycja Ziober-MalinowskaFirst Chair and Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Marcin BobińskiFirst Chair and Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Rafael López-LópezTranslational Medical Oncology, Health Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), SERGAS, Santiago, Spain.
Miguel AbalTranslational Medical Oncology, Health Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), SERGAS, Santiago, Spain.
Jaume ReventósHospital Universati de Bellvitge, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain.
Xavier Matias-GuiuDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLLEIDA, Lleida, Spain.
Gema Moreno-BuenoDepartamento de Bioquímica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas 'Alberto Sols' (CSIC-UAM), IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer is the most common cancer of the female genital tract in developed countries. Although the majority of endometrial cancers are diagnosed at early stages and the 5-year overall survival is around 80%, early detection of these tumors is crucial to improve the survival of patients given that the advanced tumors are associated with a poor outcome. Furthermore, correct assessment of the pre-clinical diagnosis is decisive to guide the surgical treatment and management of the patient. In this sense, the potential of targeted genetic sequencing of uterine aspirates has been assessed as a pre-operative tool to obtain reliable information regarding the mutational profile of a given tumor, even in samples that are not histologically classifiable. A total of 83 paired samples were sequenced (uterine aspirates and hysterectomy specimens), including 62 endometrioid and non-endometrioid tumors, 10 cases of atypical hyperplasia and 11 non-cancerous endometrial disorders. Even though diagnosing endometrial cancer based exclusively on genetic alterations is currently unfeasible, mutations were mainly found in uterine aspirates from malignant disorders, suggesting its potential in the near future for supporting the standard histologic diagnosis. Moreover, this approach provides the first evidence of the high intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity associated with endometrial cancer, evident when multiple regions of tumors are analyzed from an individual hysterectomy. Notably, the genetic analysis of uterine aspirates captures this heterogeneity, solving the potential problem of incomplete genetic characterization when a single tumor biopsy is analyzed.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, EndometrioidCarcinosarcomaEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMutationUterus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.