Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27586138›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2017

Chess databases as a research vehicle in psychology: Modeling large data.

Nemanja Vaci, Merim Bilalić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Computers and chess masters: The role of AI in transforming elite human performance.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Individual and team performance in cricket.Royal Society open science · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The joint influence of intelligence and practice on skill development throughout the life span.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nemanja VaciCognitive Psychology, Institute for Psychology, University of Klagenfurt, Universitätsstr. 65-67, 9020, Klagenfurt, Austria. nemanja.vaci@aau.at.ORCID 0000-0002-8094-0902
Merim BilalićCognitive Psychology, Institute for Psychology, University of Klagenfurt, Universitätsstr. 65-67, 9020, Klagenfurt, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The game of chess has often been used for psychological investigations, particularly in cognitive science. The clear-cut rules and well-defined environment of chess provide a model for investigations of basic cognitive processes, such as perception, memory, and problem solving, while the precise rating system for the measurement of skill has enabled investigations of individual differences and expertise-related effects. In the present study, we focus on another appealing feature of chess-namely, the large archive databases associated with the game. The German national chess database presented in this study represents a fruitful ground for the investigation of multiple longitudinal research questions, since it collects the data of over 130,000 players and spans over 25 years. The German chess database collects the data of all players, including hobby players, and all tournaments played. This results in a rich and complete collection of the skill, age, and activity of the whole population of chess players in Germany. The database therefore complements the commonly used expertise approach in cognitive science by opening up new possibilities for the investigation of multiple factors that underlie expertise and skill acquisition. Since large datasets are not common in psychology, their introduction also raises the question of optimal and efficient statistical analysis. We offer the database for download and illustrate how it can be used by providing concrete examples and a step-by-step tutorial using different statistical analyses on a range of topics, including skill development over the lifetime, birth cohort effects, effects of activity and inactivity on skill, and gender differences.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualModels, PsychologicalCognitive ScienceGames, RecreationalGermanyHumansMemoryChessExpertiseGender differencesLarge datasetsLongitudinal datasetNonlinear analysisSkill development

Identifiers

PMID27586138
PMCPMC5541096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.