Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27586071›Full record

Trial reportJournal of school psychology2016

A cluster randomized controlled trial of the Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies (PATHS) curriculum.

Neil Humphrey, Alexandra Barlow, Michael Wigelsworth, Ann Lendrum, Kirsty Pert, Craig Joyce, Emma Stephens, Lawrence Wo, Garry Squires, Kevin Woods and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of school psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Quality Matters: Implementation Moderates Student Outcomes in the PATHS Curriculum.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2018
    Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neil HumphreyManchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. Electronic address: neil.humphrey@manchester.ac.uk.
Alexandra BarlowManchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Michael WigelsworthManchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Ann LendrumManchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Kirsty PertManchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Craig JoyceManchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Emma StephensManchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Lawrence WoManchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Garry SquiresManchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Kevin WoodsManchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Rachel CalamSchool of Psychological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Alex TurnerManchester Centre for Health Economics, Institute of Population Health, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
University of Manchester · GB

Funding

Department of Health 10/3006/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated the efficacy of the Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies curriculum (PATHS; Kusche & Greenberg, 1994) as a means to improve children's social-emotional competence (assessed via the Social Skills Improvement System (SSIS); Gresham & Elliot, 2008) and mental health outcomes (assessed via the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ); Goodman, 1997). Forty-five schools in Greater Manchester, England, were randomly assigned to treatment and control groups. Allocation was balanced by proportions of children eligible for free school meals and speaking English as an additional language via minimization. Children (N=4516) aged 7-9years at baseline in the participating schools were the target cohort. During the two-year trial period, teachers of this cohort in schools allocated to the intervention group delivered the PATHS curriculum, while their counterparts in the control group continued their usual provision. Teachers in PATHS schools received initial training and on-going support and assistance from trained coaches. Hierarchical linear modeling of outcome data was undertaken to identify both primary (e.g., for all children) and secondary (e.g., for children classified as "at-risk") intervention effects. A primary effect of the PATHS curriculum was found, demonstrating increases in teacher ratings of changes in children's social-emotional competence. Additionally, secondary effects of PATHS were identified, showing reductions in teacher ratings of emotional symptoms and increases in pro-social behavior and child ratings of engagement among children identified as at-risk at baseline. However, our analyses also identified primary effects favoring the usual provision group, showing reductions in teacher ratings of peer problems and emotional symptoms, and secondary effects demonstrating reductions in teacher ratings of conduct problems and child ratings of co-operation among at-risk children. Effect sizes were small in all cases. These mixed findings suggest that social and emotional learning interventions such as PATHS may not be as efficacious when implemented outside their country of origin and evaluated in independent trials.

Indexed as

Child BehaviorChild DevelopmentCurriculumThinkingChildFemaleHumansMaleTeachingElementary schoolMental healthRandomized trialSocial and emotional learningUniversal

Identifiers

PMID27586071
PMCPMC5019026
OpenAlexW2513778073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.