Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27585881›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016

Risk-conscious correction of batch effects: maximising information extraction from high-throughput genomic datasets.

Yalchin Oytam, Fariborz Sobhanmanesh, Konsta Duesing, Joshua C Bowden, Megan Osmond-McLeod, Jason Ross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Development and validation of MethylCog, a blood DNA methylation proxy for cognition.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. BatchFLEX: feature-level equalization of X-batch.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yalchin OytamCSIRO, Genomics and Cellular Sciences, Transformational Biology CP, North Ryde, NSW, Australia. yalchin.oytam@csiro.au.
Fariborz SobhanmaneshCSIRO, Genomics and Cellular Sciences, Transformational Biology CP, North Ryde, NSW, Australia.
Konsta DuesingCSIRO, Genomics and Cellular Sciences, Transformational Biology CP, North Ryde, NSW, Australia.
Joshua C BowdenCSIRO, IM&T, Science Applications, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Megan Osmond-McLeodCSIRO, Genomics and Cellular Sciences, Advanced Materials CP (Nanosafety), 11 Julius Avenue, North Ryde, NSW, 2113, Australia.
Jason RossCSIRO, Genomics and Cellular Sciences, Transformational Biology CP, North Ryde, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBatch effects are a persistent and pervasive form of measurement noise which undermine the scientific utility of high-throughput genomic datasets. At their most benign, they reduce the power of statistical tests resulting in actual effects going unidentified. At their worst, they constitute confounds and render datasets useless. Attempting to remove batch effects will result in some of the biologically meaningful component of the measurement (i.e. signal) being lost. We present and benchmark a novel technique, called Harman. Harman maximises the removal of batch noise with the constraint that the risk of also losing biologically meaningful component of the measurement is kept to a fraction which is set by the user.

resultsAnalyses of three independent publically available datasets reveal that Harman removes more batch noise and preserves more signal at the same time, than the current leading technique. Results also show that Harman is able to identify and remove batch effects no matter what their relative size compared to other sources of variation in the dataset. Of particular advantage for meta-analyses and data integration is Harman's superior consistency in achieving comparable noise suppression - signal preservation trade-offs across multiple datasets, with differing number of treatments, replicates and processing batches.

conclusionHarman's ability to better remove batch noise, and better preserve biologically meaningful signal simultaneously within a single study, and maintain the user-set trade-off between batch noise rejection and signal preservation across different studies makes it an effective alternative method to deal with batch effects in high-throughput genomic datasets. Harman is flexible in terms of the data types it can process. It is available publically as an R package ( https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/Harman.html ), as well as a compiled Matlab package ( http://www.bioinformatics.csiro.au/harman/ ) which does not require a Matlab license to run.

Indexed as

GenomicsHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalPrincipal Component AnalysisSequence Analysis, RNABatch effectsComBatGuided PCAHigh-throughput genomic dataMeasurement noisePrincipal component analysisSingular value decomposition

Identifiers

PMID27585881
PMCPMC5009651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.