Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27585838›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2016

Leveraging syntactic and semantic graph kernels to extract pharmacokinetic drug drug interactions from biomedical literature.

Yaoyun Zhang, Heng-Yi Wu, Jun Xu, Jingqi Wang, Ergin Soysal, Lang Li, Hua Xu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Leveraging prior knowledge for protein-protein interaction extraction with memory network.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Semantic Role Labeling of Clinical Text: Comparing Syntactic Parsers and Features.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yaoyun ZhangSchool of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Heng-Yi WuSchool of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Jun XuSchool of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Jingqi WangSchool of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Ergin SoysalSchool of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Lang LiSchool of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. lali@iu.edu.
Hua XuSchool of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. hua.xu@uth.tmc.edu.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001108 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DENNE, SCOTT C., SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2013 to 2017
$23.3M
Clinical Importance of Drug-Drug InteractionsR01AG025152 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HENNESSY, SEAN, LI, LANG · 2006 to 2021
$8.1M
Evidence-based Drug-Interaction Discovery: In-Vivo, In-Vitro and ClinicalR01LM011945 · NLM · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI LI, LANG, ROCHA, LUIS M · 2014 to 2017
$1.8M
A Translational Bioinformatics Approach in the Drug Interaction ResearchR01GM104483 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, LANG · 2014 to 2017
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001108NIA NIH HHS R01 AG025152NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104483NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformation about drug-drug interactions (DDIs) supported by scientific evidence is crucial for establishing computational knowledge bases for applications like pharmacovigilance. Since new reports of DDIs are rapidly accumulating in the scientific literature, text-mining techniques for automatic DDI extraction are critical. We propose a novel approach for automated pharmacokinetic (PK) DDI detection that incorporates syntactic and semantic information into graph kernels, to address the problem of sparseness associated with syntactic-structural approaches. First, we used a novel all-path graph kernel using shallow semantic representation of sentences. Next, we statistically integrated fine-granular semantic classes into the dependency and shallow semantic graphs.

resultsWhen evaluated on the PK DDI corpus, our approach significantly outperformed the original all-path graph kernel that is based on dependency structure. Our system that combined dependency graph kernel with semantic classes achieved the best F-scores of 81.94 % for in vivo PK DDIs and 69.34 % for in vitro PK DDIs, respectively. Further, combining shallow semantic graph kernel with semantic classes achieved the highest precisions of 84.88 % for in vivo PK DDIs and 74.83 % for in vitro PK DDIs, respectively.

conclusionsWe presented a graph kernel based approach to combine syntactic and semantic information for extracting pharmacokinetic DDIs from Biomedical Literature. Experimental results showed that our proposed approach could extract PK DDIs from literature effectively, which significantly enhanced the performance of the original all-path graph kernel based on dependency structure.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchComputer GraphicsDrug InteractionsPharmacokineticsPublicationsSemanticsComputational BiologyData Mining

Identifiers

PMID27585838
PMCPMC5009562
OpenAlexW2516562520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.