Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27585745›Full record

Trial reportBMC pediatrics2016

Efficacy and safety of hepcidin-based screen-and-treat approaches using two different doses versus a standard universal approach of iron supplementation in young children in rural Gambia: a double-blind randomised controlled trial.

Rita Wegmüller, Amat Bah, Lindsay Kendall, Morgan M Goheen, Sarah Mulwa, Carla Cerami, Diego Moretti, Andrew M Prentice

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Rita WegmüllerMRC Unit The Gambia/MRC International Nutrition Group, Keneba, The Gambia. rwegmuller@mrc.gm.ORCID 0000-0002-0269-1939
Amat BahMRC Unit The Gambia/MRC International Nutrition Group, Keneba, The Gambia.
Lindsay KendallMRC Unit The Gambia, Fajara, The Gambia.
Morgan M GoheenDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Sarah MulwaMRC Unit The Gambia, Fajara, The Gambia.
Carla CeramiDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Diego MorettiLaboratory of Human Nutrition, Institute of Food, Nutrition and Health, ETH Zurich, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andrew M PrenticeMRC Unit The Gambia/MRC International Nutrition Group, Keneba, The Gambia.
MRC Unit the Gambia · GMUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USETH Zurich · CH

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U123292699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIron deficiency prevalence rates frequently exceed 50 % in young children in low-income countries. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommended universal supplementation of young children where anaemia rates are >40 %. However, large randomized trials have revealed that provision of iron to young children caused serious adverse effects because iron powerfully promotes microbial growth. Hepcidin - the master regulator of iron metabolism that integrates signals of infection and iron deficiency - offers the possibility of new solutions to diagnose and combat global iron deficiency. We aim to evaluate a hepcidin-screening-based iron supplementation intervention using hepcidin cut-offs designed to indicate that an individual requires iron, is safe to receive it and will absorb it.

methodsThe study is a proof-of-concept, three-arm, double blind, randomised controlled, prospective, parallel-group non-inferiority trial. Children will be randomised to receive, for a duration of 12 weeks, one of three multiple micronutrient powders (MNP) containing: A) 12 mg iron daily; B) 12 mg or 0 mg iron daily based on a weekly hepcidin screening indicating if iron can be given for the next seven days or not; C) 6 mg or 0 mg iron daily based on a weekly hepcidin screening indicating if iron can be given for the next seven days or not. The inclusion criteria are age 6-23 months, haemoglobin (Hb) concentration between 7 and 11 g/dL, z-scores for Height-for-Age, Weight-for-Age and Weight-for-Height > -3 SD and free of malaria. Hb concentration at 12 weeks will be used to test whether the screen-and-treat approaches are non-inferior to universal supplementation. Safety will be assessed using caregiver reports of infections, in vitro bacterial and P. falciparum growth assays and by determining the changes in the gut microbiota during the study period. DISCUSSION: A screen-and-treat approach using hepcidin has the potential to make iron administration safer in areas with widespread infections. If this proof-of-concept study shows promising results the development of a point-of-care diagnostic test will be the next step.

trial registrationISRCTN07210906 , 07/16/2014.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsRural Health ServicesAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyBiomarkersClinical ProtocolsDeveloping CountriesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFerrous CompoundsFollow-Up StudiesGambiaHemoglobinsHepcidinsHumansInfantMaleBiomarkersFerrous Compoundsferrous fumarateHemoglobinsHepcidinsMicronutrientsAnaemiaChildrenGambiaHepcidinIron deficiencyIron deficiency anaemiaIron supplementationSafetySub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID27585745
PMCPMC5009643
OpenAlexW2509442676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.