Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27585433›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2016

Fate and impact of zero-valent copper nanoparticles on geographically-distinct soils.

Vishal Shah, Todd Peter Luxton, Virginia K Walker, Terrell Brumfield, Jerry Yost, Shreya Shah, Jeremy E Wilkinson, Murty Kambhampati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vishal ShahCollege of the Sciences and Mathematics, West Chester University, West Chester, PA 19382, USA. Electronic address: vshah@wcupa.edu.
Todd Peter LuxtonNational Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45224, USA.
Virginia K WalkerDepartment of Biology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Terrell BrumfieldDepartment of Natural Sciences, Southern University at New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70126, USA.
Jerry YostDepartment of Natural Sciences, Southern University at New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70126, USA.
Shreya ShahCollege of the Sciences and Mathematics, West Chester University, West Chester, PA 19382, USA.
Jeremy E WilkinsonResearch and Testing Laboratory, Lubbock, TX 79407, USA.
Murty KambhampatiDepartment of Natural Sciences, Southern University at New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70126, USA.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fate of engineered zero-valent copper nanoparticles (Cu NPs) in soils collected from geographically-distinct regions of the continental United States and incubated under controlled conditions was investigated with respect to NP affinity for soil surfaces and changes in speciation, as well as their impact on bacterial communities. Soil geochemical properties had a great influence on Cu NP migration and transformation. Translocation of Cu NPs was low in soils enriched in organic matter and high in clay and sandy soils. X-ray absorption spectroscopic analysis showed that the highest rates for transformation to Cu ions and adsorption complexes was in acidic soils. Although there was some change in overall bacterial community richness at the level of order in experimental soil, the level of perturbation was evident in side-by-side comparisons of orders using a 50% microbial community change value (MCC

Indexed as

CopperGeographyMetal NanoparticlesSoilSoil PollutantsUnited StatesCopperSoilSoil PollutantsBacteriaCopper nanoparticlesEnvironmental impactRegression modelTransport

Identifiers

PMID27585433
PMCPMC7384298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.