The Positive and Negative about Positive Airway Pressure Therapy.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Peer-Driven Intervention for Care Coordination and Adherence Promotion for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized, Parallel-Group Clinical Trial.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
   Trial
2. Personalized and Patient-Centered Strategies to Improve Positive Airway Pressure Adherence in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Patient preference and adherence · 2021
   Review
3. Sleep Disturbances as a Risk Factor for Stroke.Journal of stroke · 2018
   Review
4. Update in Sleep-disordered Breathing 2016.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2017
   Review
5. Implementation of Sleep and Circadian Science: Recommendations from the Sleep Research Society and National Institutes of Health Workshop.Sleep · 2016
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Effect of Positive Airway Pressure on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Coronary Artery Disease Patients with Nonsleepy Obstructive Sleep Apnea. The RICCADSA Randomized Controlled Trial.2016

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as