Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27584613›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2016

Drosophila Wnt and STAT Define Apoptosis-Resistant Epithelial Cells for Tissue Regeneration after Irradiation.

Shilpi Verghese, Tin Tin Su

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Unraveling the role ofZoological research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Size compensation inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Imaginal Disc Regeneration: Something Old, Something New.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shilpi VergheseDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Tin Tin SuDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
University of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Resource Component: Acquisition, maintenance and distribution of Drosophila stocksP40OD018537 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Annette L. Parks · 2014 to 2026
$13.5M
Consequences of Cell Death in DrosophilaR01GM106317 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI SU, TIN TIN · 2014 to 2017
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM106317NIH HHS P40 OD018537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster larvae irradiated with doses of ionizing radiation (IR) that kill about half of the cells in larval imaginal discs still develop into viable adults. How surviving cells compensate for IR-induced cell death to produce organs of normal size and appearance remains an active area of investigation. We have identified a subpopulation of cells within the continuous epithelium of Drosophila larval wing discs that shows intrinsic resistance to IR- and drug-induced apoptosis. These cells reside in domains of high Wingless (Wg, Drosophila Wnt-1) and STAT92E (sole Drosophila signal transducer and activator of transcription [STAT] homolog) activity and would normally form the hinge in the adult fly. Resistance to IR-induced apoptosis requires STAT and Wg and is mediated by transcriptional repression of the pro-apoptotic gene reaper. Lineage tracing experiments show that, following irradiation, apoptosis-resistant cells lose their identity and translocate to areas of the wing disc that suffered abundant cell death. Our findings provide a new paradigm for regeneration in which it is unnecessary to invoke special damage-resistant cell types such as stem cells. Instead, differences in gene expression within a population of genetically identical epithelial cells can create a subpopulation with greater resistance, which, following damage, survive, alter their fate, and help regenerate the tissue.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEpithelial CellsGene ExpressionGene SilencingImaginal DiscsLarvaRadiation Injuries, ExperimentalRegenerationSTAT Transcription FactorsWnt1 ProteinDrosophila Proteinsrpr protein, DrosophilaStat92E protein, DrosophilaSTAT Transcription Factorswg protein, DrosophilaWnt1 Protein

Identifiers

PMID27584613
PMCPMC5008734
OpenAlexW2511096703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.