Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27584088›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Comparing Effectiveness of Active and Passive Client Follow-Up Approaches in Sustaining the Continued Use of Long Acting Reversible Contraceptives (LARC) in Rural Punjab: A Multicentre, Non-Inferiority Trial.

Waqas Hameed, Syed Khurram Azmat, Moazzam Ali, Muhammad Ishaque, Ghazunfer Abbas, Erik Munroe, Rebecca Harrison, Wajahat Hussain Shamsi, Ghulam Mustafa, Omar Farooq Khan and 2 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Telehealth Interventions Designed for Women: an Evidence Map.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Waqas HameedMarie Stopes Society, Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Department, Technical Services, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Syed Khurram AzmatDepartment of Uro-Gynecology, University of Ghent, 9000 East Flanders, Belgium.
Moazzam AliDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Muhammad IshaqueMarie Stopes Society, Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Department, Technical Services, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Ghazunfer AbbasMarie Stopes Society, Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Department, Technical Services, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Erik MunroeMarie Stopes International, Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Department, London, United Kingdom.
Rebecca HarrisonMarie Stopes International, Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Department, London, United Kingdom.
Wajahat Hussain ShamsiMarie Stopes Society, Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Department, Technical Services, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Ghulam MustafaMarie Stopes Society, Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Department, Technical Services, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Omar Farooq KhanMarie Stopes Society, Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Department, Technical Services, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Safdar AliMarie Stopes Society, Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Department, Technical Services, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Aftab AhmedMarie Stopes Society, Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Department, Technical Services, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods is very low in Pakistan with high discontinuation rates mainly attributed to method-related side effects. Mixed evidence is available on the effectiveness of different client follow-up approaches used to ensure method continuation. We compared the effectiveness of active and passive follow-up approaches in sustaining the use of LARC-and within 'active' follow-up, we further compared a telephone versus home-based approach in rural Punjab, Pakistan.

methodsThis was a 12-month multicentre non-inferiority trial conducted in twenty-two (16 rural- and 6 urban-based) franchised reproductive healthcare facilities in district Chakwal of Punjab province, between November 2013 and December 2014. The study comprised of three groups of LARC clients: a) home-based follow-up, b) telephone-based follow-up, and c) passive or needs-based follow-up. Participants in the first two study groups received counselling on scheduled follow-up from the field workers at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 month post-insertion whereas participants in the third group were asked to contact the health facility if in need of medical assistance relating to LARC method use. Study participants were recruited with equal allocation to each study group, but participants were not randomized. The analyses are based on 1,246 LARC (intra-uterine contraceptive device and implant) users that completed approximately 12-months of follow-up. The non-inferiority margin was kept at five percentage points for the comparison of active and passive follow-up and six percentage points for telephone and home-based approach. The primary outcome was cumulative probability of method continuation at 12-month among LARC users.

resultsWomen recruited in home-based, telephone-based, and passive groups were 400, 419 and 427, respectively. The cumulative probability of LARC continuation at 12 month was 87.6% (95% CI 83.8 to 90.6) among women who received home-based follow-up; 89.1% (95% CI 85.7, 91.8) who received telephone-based follow-up; and 83.8% (95% CI 79.8 to 87.1) who were in the passive or needs-based follow-up group. The probability of continuation among women who were actively followed-up by field health educators-either through home-based visit or telephone-based follow-up was, 88.3% (95% CI 85.9 to 90.0). An adjusted risk difference of -4.1 (95% CI -7.8 to -0.28; p-value = 0.035) was estimated between active and passive follow-up. Whereas, within the active client follow-up, the telephone-based follow-up was found to be as effective as the home-based follow-up with an adjusted risk difference of 1.8 (95% CI -2.7 to 6.4; p-value = 0.431).

conclusionA passive follow-up approach was 5% inferior to an active follow-up approach; whereas telephone-based follow-up was as effective as the home-based visits in sustaining the use of LARC, and was far more resource efficient. Therefore, active follow-up could improve method continuation especially in the critical post-insertion period.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationContraceptive Agents, FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansPakistanPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient SatisfactionContraceptive Agents, Female

Identifiers

PMID27584088
PMCPMC5008757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.