Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27583852›Full record

ArticleMedicine2016

Optimal stapler cartridge selection according to the thickness of the pancreas in distal pancreatectomy.

Hongbeom Kim, Jin-Young Jang, Donghee Son, Seungyeoun Lee, Youngmin Han, Yong Chan Shin, Jae Ri Kim, Wooil Kwon, Sun-Whe Kim

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03880773 (Tri Stapler vs. Ultrasonic Scalpel in Distal Pancreatectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03880773 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Tri Stapler vs. Ultrasonic Scalpel in Distal Pancreatectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata VeronaRan2018 to 2020Enrolled152ConditionsPancreatic Fistula, Distal PancreatectomyArmsStapler, ultrasonic shears
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Pancreatic stump closure using only stapler is associated with high postoperative fistula rate after minimal invasive surgery.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2018
    Article
  17. Pancreatic Fistula after Distal Pancreatectomy with Stapler.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hongbeom KimDepartment of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, College of Medicine, Seoul National University Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Sejong University, Seoul, Korea.
Jin-Young Jang
Donghee Son
Seungyeoun Lee
Youngmin Han
Yong Chan Shin
Jae Ri Kim
Wooil Kwon
Sun-Whe Kim
Cancer Research Institute · USSejong University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stapling is a popular method for stump closure in distal pancreatectomy (DP). However, research on which cartridges are suitable for different pancreatic thickness is lacking. To identify the optimal stapler cartridge choice in DP according to pancreatic thickness.From November 2011 to April 2015, data were prospectively collected from 217 consecutive patients who underwent DP with 3-layer endoscopic staple closure in Seoul National University Hospital, Korea. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) was graded according to International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula definitions. Staplers were grouped based on closed length (CL) (Group I: CL ≤ 1.5 mm, II: 1.5 mm < CL < 2 mm, III: CL ≥ 2 mm). Compression ratio (CR) was defined as pancreas thickness/CL. Distribution of pancreatic thickness was used to find the cut-off point of thickness which predicts POPF according to stapler groups.POPF developed in 130 (59.9%) patients (Grade A; n = 86 [66.1%], B; n = 44 [33.8%]). The numbers in each stapler group were 46, 101, and 70, respectively. Mean thickness was higher in POPF cases (15.2 mm vs 13.5 mm, P = 0.002). High body mass index (P = 0.003), thick pancreas (P = 0.011), and high CR (P = 0.024) were independent risk factors for POPF in multivariate analysis. Pancreatic thickness was grouped into <12 mm, 12 to 17 mm, and >17 mm. With pancreatic thickness <12 mm, the POPF rate was lowest with Group II (I: 50%, II: 27.6%, III: 69.2%, P = 0.035).The optimal stapler cartridges with pancreatic thickness <12 mm were those in Group II (Gold, CL: 1.8 mm). There was no suitable cartridge for thicker pancreases. Further studies are necessary to reduce POPF in thick pancreases.

Indexed as

Surgical StaplersAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgan SizePancreasPancreatectomyPancreatic FistulaProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID27583852
PMCPMC5008536
OpenAlexW2512804299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.