Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27583569›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

X-Ray Psoralen Activated Cancer Therapy (X-PACT).

Mark Oldham, Paul Yoon, Zak Fathi, Wayne F Beyer, Justus Adamson, Leihua Liu, David Alcorta, Wenle Xia, Takuya Osada, Congxiao Liu and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Psoralen: a narrative review of current and future therapeutic uses.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Fanconi anemia-independent DNA inter-strand crosslink repair in eukaryotes.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2020
    Review
  9. Psoralen Derivatives with Enhanced Potency.Photochemistry and photobiology · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Enhancing Radiation Therapy Through Cherenkov Light-Activated Phototherapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark OldhamDept. of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Paul YoonDept. of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Zak FathiImmunolight LLC, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America.
Wayne F BeyerQNS Group, LLC, Bahama, North Carolina, United States of America.
Justus AdamsonDept. of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Leihua LiuDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
David AlcortaDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Wenle XiaDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Takuya OsadaDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Congxiao LiuDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Xiao Y YangDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Rebecca D DoddDept. of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
James E HerndonDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Boyu MengDept. of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
David G KirschDept. of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
H Kim LyerlyDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Mark W DewhirstDept. of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Peter FecciDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Harold WalderDept. of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Neil L SpectorDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Duke Medical Center · USImmunolight (United States) · US

Funding

Targeted Alpha-Particle Radiotheraphy of Brain Tumors with 211At-81C6 AntibodyP50CA190991 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SAMPSON, JOHN H. · 2014 to 2023
$20.8M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA190991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work investigates X-PACT (X-ray Psoralen Activated Cancer Therapy): a new approach for the treatment of solid cancer. X-PACT utilizes psoralen, a potent anti-cancer therapeutic with current application to proliferative disease and extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) of cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma. An immunogenic role for light-activated psoralen has been reported, contributing to long-term clinical responses. Psoralen therapies have to-date been limited to superficial or extracorporeal scenarios due to the requirement for psoralen activation by UVA light, which has limited penetration in tissue. X-PACT solves this challenge by activating psoralen with UV light emitted from novel non-tethered phosphors (co-incubated with psoralen) that absorb x-rays and re-radiate (phosphoresce) at UV wavelengths. The efficacy of X-PACT was evaluated in both in-vitro and in-vivo settings. In-vitro studies utilized breast (4T1), glioma (CT2A) and sarcoma (KP-B) cell lines. Cells were exposed to X-PACT treatments where the concentrations of drug (psoralen and phosphor) and radiation parameters (energy, dose, and dose rate) were varied. Efficacy was evaluated primarily using flow cell cytometry in combination with complimentary assays, and the in-vivo mouse study. In an in-vitro study, we show that X-PACT induces significant tumor cell apoptosis and cytotoxicity, unlike psoralen or phosphor alone (p<0.0001). We also show that apoptosis increases as doses of phosphor, psoralen, or radiation increase. Finally, in an in-vivo pilot study of BALBc mice with syngeneic 4T1 tumors, we show that the rate of tumor growth is slower with X-PACT than with saline or AMT + X-ray (p<0.0001). Overall these studies demonstrate a potential therapeutic effect for X-PACT, and provide a foundation and rationale for future studies. In summary, X-PACT represents a novel treatment approach in which well-tolerated low doses of x-ray radiation are delivered to a specific tumor site to generate UVA light which in-turn unleashes both short- and potentially long-term antitumor activity of photo-active therapeutics like psoralen.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisCell Line, TumorCell Transformation, NeoplasticDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFicusinMiceNeoplasmsX-Ray TherapyFicusin

Identifiers

PMID27583569
PMCPMC5008763
OpenAlexW4254126892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.