Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27583387›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2016

Survey and evidence based review of probiotics used in very low birth weight preterm infants within the United States.

S Viswanathan, C Lau, H Akbari, C Hoyen, M C Walsh

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Developing a prioritized research agenda for necrotizing enterocolitis.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Contemporary use of prophylactic probiotics in NICUs in the United States: a survey update.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Effects of prophylactic probiotics supplementation on infants born very preterm or very low birth weight.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Next-Generation Probiotic Therapy to Protect the Intestines From Injury.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S ViswanathanDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital, University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1367-9134
C LauDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital, University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
H AkbariDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital, University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
C HoyenDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital, University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
M C WalshDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital, University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveData from multiple clinical trials, mostly conducted outside the US, indicate that probiotic prophylaxis is an effective intervention for prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in preterm infants. Probiotics are routinely used in many countries. However, in the US, probiotic use in preterm infants is limited (6.7% of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants in the US were exposed to probiotics in 2014, Vermont Oxford Network (VON)). Probiotic products are often considered in 'generic' terms, but considerable variation exists between commercially available probiotics in terms of their quantity and quality. The study objectives were to identify the probiotic products used in VLBW infants within the US, and to determine whether their use was supported by reliable evidence. STUDY

designA phone survey of all neonatal intensive care units (NICU) participating in VON within the US was conducted between May and September 2015 to identify NICUs that are using probiotics in VLBW infants. Data was collected regarding specific probiotic brands, timing, dose and duration of probiotic use. An evidence based literature search, limited to randomized controlled trials in VLBW infants, was conducted to determine whether the use of identified probiotics were supported by reliable evidence.

resultsThere was a 70.3% (500/711) response rate to the phone survey. During the survey period, 14.0% of NICUs were using probiotics in VLBW infants (70/500). Probiotics were routinely given to all VLBW infants in 8.8% (44/500) NICUs, while it was given in selected VLBW infants in 5.2% (26/500) of NICUs. The common indications for selective use of probiotics were feeding intolerance and antibiotic use. Sixteen commercial probiotics products were identified through the phone survey. Probiotic products most commonly used were Culturelle (27.1%), Biogaia (14.3%), Gerber Soothe (14.3%) and Florababy (8.6%). The literature search identified evidence that evaluated 4/16 probiotic products identified (Culturelle, Align, Biogaia and ABC Dophilus). Only ABC Dophilus was reported to have a protective effect against NEC, but is used sparingly in US NICUs (2.9%).

conclusionsThe probiotics use in VLBW infants within the US is increasing, but is still limited. There was no evidence for safety or efficacy of 90% of the probiotics currently used in US NICUs, and therefore, caution is warranted.

Indexed as

Infant, Very Low Birth WeightCross-Sectional StudiesEnterocolitis, NecrotizingHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntensive Care Units, NeonatalProbioticsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRiskSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID27583387
OpenAlexW2518267860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.