Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27583251›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2016

Applications of In Ovo Technique for the Optimal Development of the Gastrointestinal Tract and the Potential Influence on the Establishment of Its Microbiome in Poultry.

Stephanie M Roto, Young Min Kwon, Steven C Ricke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Effects ofJournal of animal science and technology · 2026
    Article
  5. Effects of incubation temperature andFrontiers in physiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Nearly (?) sterile avian egg in a passerine bird.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Physiological effects ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Potential Implication ofTranslational animal science · 2023
    Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephanie M RotoDepartment of Food Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA; Center for Food Safety, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Young Min KwonCenter for Food Safety, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA; Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA; Cell and Molecular Biology Program, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Steven C RickeDepartment of Food Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA; Center for Food Safety, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA; Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA; Cell and Molecular Biology Program, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the current poultry production system stands, there is a period of time when newly hatched chicks are prevented from access to feed for approximately 48-72 h. Research has indicated that this delay in feeding may result in decreased growth performance when compared to chicks that are fed immediately post-hatch. To remedy this issue, in ovo methodology may be applied in order to supply the embryo with additional nutrients prior to hatching and those nutrients will continue to be utilized by the chick post-hatch during the fasting period. Furthermore, in ovo injection of various biologics have been researched based on the ability of not only supplying the chick embryo with additional nutrients that would promote improved growth but also compounds that may benefit the future health of the chicken host. Such compounds include various immunostimulants, live beneficial bacteria, prebiotics, and synbiotics. However, it is important to determine the site and age of the in ovo injection for the most productive effects. The primary focus of the current review is to address these two issues [the most effective site(s) and age(s) of in ovo injection] as well as provide the framework for the development of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of the chick embryo. Additionally, recent research suggests the colonization of the microbiota in the developing chick may occur during the late stages of embryogenesis. Therefore, we will also discuss the potentials of the in ovo injection method in establishing a healthy and diverse community of microorganisms to colonize the developing GIT that will provide both protection from pathogen invasion and improvement in growth performance to developing chicks.

Indexed as

gastrointestinal tract developmentin ovomicrobiomepoultrysupplements

Identifiers

PMID27583251
PMCPMC4987676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.