ArticleMobile DNA2016
Convergent evolution of tRNA gene targeting preferences in compact genomes.
Article in Mobile DNA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive analysis of the Xya riparia genome uncovers the dominance of DNA transposons, LTR/Gypsy elements, and their evolutionary dynamics.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Integrase-associated niche differentiation of endogenous large DNA viruses in crustaceans.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Evolutionary dynamics between transposable elements and their host genomes: mechanisms of suppression and escape.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2023Review
- Nanopore sequencing for mapping of retrotransposon integration sites in themicroPublication biology · 2022Article
- Clustering of Sex-Biased Genes and Transposable Elements in the Genome of the Medaka Fish Oryzias latipes.Genome biology and evolution · 2021Article
- The Structural, Functional and Evolutionary Impact of Transposable Elements in Eukaryotes.Genes · 2021Review
- Light and shadow on the mechanisms of integration site selection in yeast Ty retrotransposon families.Current genetics · 2021Review
- A small targeting domain in Ty1 integrase is sufficient to direct retrotransposon integration upstream of tRNA genes.The EMBO journal · 2020Article
- Ten things you should know about transposable elements.Genome biology · 2018Review
- Convergent evolution of integration site selection upstream of tRNA genes by yeast and amoeba retrotransposons.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Multiple Roots of Fruiting Body Formation in Amoebozoa.Genome biology and evolution · 2018Article
- Retrotransposon targeting to RNA polymerase III-transcribed genes.Mobile DNA · 2018Review
- Integration site selection by retroviruses and transposable elements in eukaryotes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2017Review
- Review
- Retrotransposon Domestication and Control inFrontiers in microbiology · 2017Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn gene-dense genomes, mobile elements are confronted with highly selective pressure to amplify without causing excessive damage to the host. The targeting of tRNA genes as potentially safe integration sites has been developed by retrotransposons in various organisms such as the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum and the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In D. discoideum, tRNA gene-targeting retrotransposons have expanded to approximately 3 % of the genome. Recently obtained genome sequences of species representing the evolutionary history of social amoebae enabled us to determine whether the targeting of tRNA genes is a generally successful strategy for mobile elements to colonize compact genomes.
resultsDuring the evolution of dictyostelids, different retrotransposon types independently developed the targeting of tRNA genes at least six times. DGLT-A elements are long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons that display integration preferences ~15 bp upstream of tRNA gene-coding regions reminiscent of the yeast Ty3 element. Skipper elements are chromoviruses that have developed two subgroups: one has canonical chromo domains that may favor integration in centromeric regions, whereas the other has diverged chromo domains and is found ~100 bp downstream of tRNA genes. The integration of D. discoideum non-LTR retrotransposons ~50 bp upstream (TRE5 elements) and ~100 bp downstream (TRE3 elements) of tRNA genes, respectively, likely emerged at the root of dictyostelid evolution. We identified two novel non-LTR retrotransposons unrelated to TREs: one with a TRE5-like integration behavior and the other with preference ~4 bp upstream of tRNA genes.
conclusionsDictyostelid retrotransposons demonstrate convergent evolution of tRNA gene targeting as a probable means to colonize the compact genomes of their hosts without being excessively mutagenic. However, high copy numbers of tRNA gene-associated retrotransposons, such as those observed in D. discoideum, are an exception, suggesting that the targeting of tRNA genes does not necessarily favor the amplification of position-specific integrating elements to high copy numbers under the repressive conditions that prevail in most host cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.