Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27582782›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2016

Laparoscopic lavage versus resection in perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Marco Ceresoli, Federico Coccolini, Giulia Montori, Fausto Catena, Massimo Sartelli, Luca Ansaloni

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04254224 (Scandinavian Diverticulitis Trial SCANDIV II), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04254224 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Scandinavian Diverticulitis Trial SCANDIV II: Treatment of Acute Complicated Diverticulitis: a Prospective Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUppsala UniversityRan2018 to 2024Enrolled500ConditionsDiverticulitis ColonArmscolon resection, stoma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Laparoscopic Lavage in the Management of Perforated Diverticulitis: a Contemporary Meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Diverticulitis, surgery, evidence-based medicine, and the Steve Jobs' dots: a narrative review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Complicated Diverticular Disease.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The Bucharest ESTES consensus statement on peritonitis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2020
    Review
  15. Percutaneous drainage for hinchey Ib and II acute diverticulitis with abscess improves outcomes.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Long-term follow-up of a multicentre cohort study on laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for perforated diverticulitis.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2019
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marco CeresoliUnit of General and Emergency Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Piazza OMS 1, 24127 Bergamo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7935-3842
Federico CoccoliniUnit of General and Emergency Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Piazza OMS 1, 24127 Bergamo, Italy.
Giulia MontoriUnit of General and Emergency Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Piazza OMS 1, 24127 Bergamo, Italy.
Fausto CatenaUnit of General and Emergency Surgery, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy.
Massimo SartelliUnit of General and Emergency Surgery, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy.
Luca AnsaloniUnit of General and Emergency Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Piazza OMS 1, 24127 Bergamo, Italy.
Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · ITOspedale di MacerataUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePurulent peritonitis from acute left colon diverticulitis is a relatively common presentation of diverticular disease; historically the treatment was the Hartmann procedure. Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage has been proposed as a lesser invasive treatment option with great interest and debate among surgeons and with contrasting results. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the results of sigmoid resection with laparoscopic lavage.

methodsA systematic review was performed to select randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic lavage versus resection in Hinchey III diverticulitis. Studies' selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were done by two independent authors; results were shown as OR with 95 % C.I.

resultsThree RCT were selected for the meta-analysis including 315 patents. Laparoscopic lavage was associated with significantly more reoperations (OR 3.75, p = 0.006) and more intra-abdominal abscesses (OR 3.50, p = 0.0003) with no differences in mortality (OR 0.93, p = 0.92). At 12 months follow up laparoscopic lavage was associated with lesser reoperations (OR 0.32, p = 0.0004); there were no differences in term of stoma presence (OR 0.44 p = 0.27) and mortality (OR 0.74 p = 0.51).

conclusionsThe present meta-analysis shows that in acute perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis laparoscopic lavage is comparable to sigmoid resection in term of mortality but it is associated with a significantly higher rate of reoperations and a higher rate of intra-abdominal abscess. No differences in term of mortality were demonstrated at follow-up. Further studies are needed to better define the safety and appropriateness of this treatment.

Indexed as

Acute diverticulitisAcute perforated diverticulitisLaparoscopic lavageMeta-analysisPurulent peritonitis

Identifiers

PMID27582782
PMCPMC5006586
OpenAlexW2513691216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.