Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27582698›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2016

Reconsolidation of Motor Memories Is a Time-Dependent Process.

Toon T de Beukelaar, Daniel G Woolley, Kaat Alaerts, Stephan P Swinnen, Nicole Wenderoth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Intersection of Offline Learning and Rehabilitation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Toon T de BeukelaarMovement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Kinesiology, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven Leuven, Belgium.
Daniel G WoolleyNeural Control of Movement Group, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zürich Zurich, Switzerland.
Kaat AlaertsResearch Group for Neuromotor Rehabilitation, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven Leuven, Belgium.
Stephan P SwinnenMovement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Kinesiology, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven Leuven, Belgium.
Nicole WenderothMovement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Kinesiology, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) LeuvenLeuven, Belgium; Neural Control of Movement Group, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH ZürichZurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reconsolidation is observed when a consolidated stable memory is recalled, which renders it transiently labile and requires re-stabilization. Motor memory reconsolidation has previously been demonstrated using a three-day design: on day 1 the memory is encoded, on day 2 it is reactivated and experimentally manipulated, and on day 3 memory strength is tested. The aim of the current study is to determine specific boundary conditions in order to consistently degrade motor memory through reconsolidation paradigms. We investigated a sequence tapping task (n = 48) with the typical three-day design and confirmed that reactivating the motor sequence briefly (10 times tapping the learned motor sequence) destabilizes the memory trace and makes it susceptible to behavioral interference. By systematically varying the time delay between memory reactivation and interference while keeping all other aspect constant we found that a short delay (i.e., 20 s) significantly decreased performance on day 3, whereas performance was maintained or small (but not significant) improvements were observed for longer delays (i.e., 60 s). We also tested a statistical model that assumed a linear effect of the different time delays (0 s, 20 s, 40 s, 60 s) on the performance changes from day 2 to day 3. This linear model revealed a significant effect consistent with the interpretation that increasing time delays caused a gradual change from performance degradation to performance conservation across groups. These findings indicate that re-stabilizing motor sequence memories during reconsolidation does not solely rely on additional motor practice but occurs with the passage of time. This study provides further support for the hypothesis that reconsolidation is a time-dependent process with a transition phase from destabilization to re-stabilization.

Indexed as

consolidationmemory updatingmotor learningreconsolidationsequence task

Identifiers

PMID27582698
PMCPMC4987356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.