Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27582655›Full record

ArticleClinics in colon and rectal surgery2016

Parastomal Hernia: Avoidance and Treatment in the 21st Century.

Sean C Glasgow, Sekhar Dharmarajan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics in colon and rectal surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Surgical strategies for recurrent parastomal hernia after a primary repair with a DynameshHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023
    Article
  6. Assessment of a support garment in parastomal bulging from a patient perspective: a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sean C GlasgowDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; USAF Center for the Sustainment of Trauma and Resuscitative Skills (C-STARS), St. Louis, Missouri.
Sekhar DharmarajanDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; John Cochrane VA Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite medical and surgical advances leading to increased ability to restore or preserve gastrointestinal continuity, creation of stomas remains a common surgical procedure. Every ostomy results in a risk for subsequent parastomal herniation, which in turn may reduce quality of life and increase health care expenditures. Recent evidence-supported practices such as utilization of prophylactic reinforcement, attention to stoma placement, and laparoscopic-based stoma repairs with mesh provide opportunities to both prevent and successfully treat parastomal hernias.

Indexed as

colostomyherniaileostomymeshparastomal

Identifiers

PMID27582655
PMCPMC4991964
OpenAlexW2513415685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.