Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27582650›Full record

ReviewClinics in colon and rectal surgery2016

Postoperative Complications: Looking Forward to a Safer Future.

Sarah E Tevis, Gregory D Kennedy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics in colon and rectal surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06010225 (The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 87 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06010225 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol Implementation in a National Tertiary-level Hospital: A Prospective Cohort Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorRidho Ardhi SyaifulRan2020 to 2023Enrolled84ConditionsEnhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol, Colorectal Surgery, Effectivity, Colorectal Neoplasms
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Post-operative Complications Following Major Gastrointestinal Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. General Principles of Risk Mitigation before Colorectal Surgery.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah E TevisDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Gregory D KennedyDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama.

Funding

UW Surgical Oncology Research Training Program (UW-SORT)T32CA090217 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Muhammed Murtaza, Heather B Neuman · 2001 to 2026
$8.3M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA090217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal surgery patients frequently suffer from postoperative complications. Patients with complications have been shown to be at higher risk for mortality, poor oncologic outcomes, additional complications, and worse quality of life. Complications are increasingly recognized as markers of quality of care with more use of risk-adjusted national surgical databases and increasing transparency in health care. Quality improvement work in colorectal surgery has identified methods to decrease complication rates and improve outcomes in this patient population. Future work will continue to identify best practices and standardized ways to measure quality of care.

Indexed as

postoperative complicationsprehabilitationsurgical quality

Identifiers

PMID27582650
PMCPMC4991963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.