Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27582626›Full record

ArticleMolecular vision2016

Next-generation sequencing-based method shows increased mutation detection sensitivity in an Indian retinoblastoma cohort.

Jaya Singh, Avshesh Mishra, Arunachalam Jayamuruga Pandian, Ashwin C Mallipatna, Vikas Khetan, S Sripriya, Suman Kapoor, Smita Agarwal, Satish Sankaran, Shanmukh Katragadda and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular vision, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mutational analysis of theFrontiers in medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. NovelDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Targeted sequencing of theThe Indian journal of medical research · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Updates in ophthalmic pathology.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jaya SinghStrand Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Strand Life Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Avshesh MishraStrand Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Strand Life Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Arunachalam Jayamuruga PandianSankara Nethralaya ONGC Department of Genetics and Molecular Biology, Vision Research Foundation, Chennai, India.
Ashwin C MallipatnaDepartment of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismology, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, India.
Vikas KhetanDepartment of Vitreo Retina, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India.
S SripriyaSankara Nethralaya ONGC Department of Genetics and Molecular Biology, Vision Research Foundation, Chennai, India.
Suman KapoorStrand Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Strand Life Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Smita AgarwalStrand Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Strand Life Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Satish SankaranStrand Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Strand Life Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Shanmukh KatragaddaStrand Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Strand Life Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Vamsi VeeramachaneniStrand Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Strand Life Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Ramesh HariharanStrand Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Strand Life Sciences, Bangalore, India; Department of Computer Science and Automation, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Kalyanasundaram SubramanianStrand Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Strand Life Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Ashraf U MannanStrand Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Strand Life Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Strand Life Sciences (India) · INNarayana Nethralaya · INSankara Nethralaya · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRetinoblastoma (Rb) is the most common primary intraocular cancer of childhood and one of the major causes of blindness in children. India has the highest number of patients with Rb in the world. Mutations in the RB1 gene are the primary cause of Rb, and heterogeneous mutations are distributed throughout the entire length of the gene. Therefore, genetic testing requires screening of the entire gene, which by conventional sequencing is time consuming and expensive.

methodsIn this study, we screened the RB1 gene in the DNA isolated from blood or saliva samples of 50 unrelated patients with Rb using the TruSight Cancer panel. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was done on the Illumina MiSeq platform. Genetic variations were identified using the Strand NGS software and interpreted using the StrandOmics platform.

resultsWe were able to detect germline pathogenic mutations in 66% (33/50) of the cases, 12 of which were novel. We were able to detect all types of mutations, including missense, nonsense, splice site, indel, and structural variants. When we considered bilateral Rb cases only, the mutation detection rate increased to 100% (22/22). In unilateral Rb cases, the mutation detection rate was 30% (6/20).

conclusionsOur study suggests that NGS-based approaches increase the sensitivity of mutation detection in the RB1 gene, making it fast and cost-effective compared to the conventional tests performed in a reflex-testing mode.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMutationAdultAsian PeopleChildChild, PreschoolCodon, NonsenseCohort StudiesDNA Mutational AnalysisExonsFemaleGenes, RetinoblastomaGenetic TestingGerm-Line MutationHumansIndiaCodon, NonsenseRB1 protein, humanRetinoblastoma Binding ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID27582626
PMCPMC4985049
OpenAlexW2508867077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.