Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27582435›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2017

Risk of Pathological Upgrading and Up Staging among Men with Low Risk Prostate Cancer Varies by Race: Results from the National Cancer Database.

Matthew J Maurice, Debasish Sundi, Edward M Schaeffer, Robert Abouassaly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effect of preoperative PI-RADS assessment on pathological outcomes in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Racial Disparities in Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Diet, Lifestyle, Family History, and Screening Patterns.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew J MauriceGlickman Urological & Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Debasish SundiDepartment of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Edward M SchaefferDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Robert AbouassalyDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address: robert.abouassaly@uhhospitals.org.

Funding

Multidiciplinary Integrative Genomic Approach to Distinguish Lethal from Indolent Prostate Cancer in Men of Europena and African AncestryU01CA196390 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DE MARZO, ANGELO MICHAEL, PIENTA, KENNETH J. · 2015 to 2020
$5.8M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA196390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe impact of African-American race on oncologic outcomes for low risk prostate cancer is unclear due to conflicting data. We investigated the effect of African-American race on pathological upgrading and/or up staging at prostatectomy in men with clinically low risk prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe queried the National Cancer Database for men with low risk prostate cancer (clinical stage T2a or less, Gleason score 6 or less, prostate specific antigen less than 10 ng/ml) treated with radical prostatectomy between 2010 and 2013. The outcomes were pathological upgrading to Gleason score greater than 6 (primary) or Gleason score greater than 3+4=7 (secondary) and/or up staging (pathological T3-4 or N1 disease). The association between race and the end points was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. To further adjust for potential confounders, stratification by urban residence and comorbidity score, and subgroup analyses were performed.

resultsWith adjustment for age, comorbidity, income, urban residence, T stage, prostate specific antigen and percentage of positive biopsy cores, African-American race conferred 1.2-fold higher odds of pathological upgrading to Gleason score greater than 6 and/or up staging (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.3, p <0.01). African-American race also was an independent predictor of pathological upgrading to Gleason score greater than 3+4=7 and/or up staging (p=0.03).

conclusionsAfrican-American men with low risk prostate cancer are more likely to harbor higher risk disease, which may lead to adverse outcomes. This finding alone does not preclude active surveillance. However, race should be considered as men weigh the risks and benefits of active surveillance vs treatment.

Indexed as

BiopsyBlack or African AmericanDemographyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRiskProstate-Specific AntigenAfrican Continental Ancestry Groupneoplasm gradingneoplasm stagingprostatic neoplasmswatchful waiting

Identifiers

PMID27582435
PMCPMC6513017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.