ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2017
Defining, distinguishing and detecting the contribution of heterogeneous methylation to cancer heterogeneity.
Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- DNA methylation heterogeneity attributable to a complex tumor immune microenvironment prompts prognostic risk in glioma.Epigenetics · 2024Article
- Multiplex digital profiling of DNA methylation heterogeneity for sensitive and cost-effective cancer detection in low-volume liquid biopsies.Science advances · 2024Article
- Interlaboratory consistency ofiScience · 2024Article
- High-throughput sample processing for methylation analysis in an automated, enclosed environment.SLAS technology · 2022Article
- Multilayer microfluidic array for highly efficient sample loading and digital melt analysis of DNA methylation.Lab on a chip · 2019Article
- Epigenetic heterogeneity in cancer.Biomarker research · 2019Review
- Facile profiling of molecular heterogeneity by microfluidic digital melt.Science advances · 2018Article
- Methylation Status of Transcriptional Modulatory Genes Associated with Colorectal Cancer in Northeast China.Gut and liver · 2018Article
- Article
- Promoter methylation of tumor-related genes as a potential biomarker using blood samples for gastric cancer detection.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- p53 is essential for DNA methylation homeostasis in naïve embryonic stem cells, and its loss promotes clonal heterogeneity.Genes & development · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
DNA methylation is a fundamental means of epigenetic gene regulation that occurs in virtually all cell types. In many higher organisms, including humans, it plays vital roles in cell differentiation and homeostatic maintenance of cell phenotype. The control of DNA methylation has traditionally been attributed to a highly coordinated, linear process, whose dysregulation has been associated with numerous pathologies including cancer, where it occurs early in, and even prior to, the development of neoplastic tissues. Recent experimental evidence has demonstrated that, contrary to prevailing paradigms, methylation patterns are actually maintained through inexact, dynamic processes. These processes normally result in minor stochastic differences between cells that accumulate with age. However, various factors, including cancer itself, can lead to substantial differences in intercellular methylation patterns, viz. methylation heterogeneity. Advancements in molecular biology techniques are just now beginning to allow insight into how this heterogeneity contributes to clonal evolution and overall cancer heterogeneity. In the current review, we begin by presenting a didactic overview of how the basal bimodal methylome is established and maintained. We then provide a synopsis of some of the factors that lead to the accrual of heterogeneous methylation and how this heterogeneity may lead to gene silencing and impact the development of cancerous phenotypes. Lastly, we highlight currently available methylation assessment techniques and discuss their suitability to the study of heterogeneous methylation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.