ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2017
Value redefined for inflammatory bowel disease patients: a choice-based conjoint analysis of patients' preferences.
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.PharmacoEconomics · 2019Pooled it
- Treatment Priorities in Patients With a History of Laryngeal Cancer: A Conjoint Analysis.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Implementing routine medical and mental health screening in children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2025Article
- Laryngeal cancer treatment decision making: A conjoint analysis of general public attitudes and priorities.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2023Article
- Treatment goals in IBD: A perspective from patients and their partners.PEC innovation · 2022Article
- The evolution of IBD perceived engagement and care needs across the life-cycle: a scoping review.BMC gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Expert consensus on moving towards a value-based healthcare system in the Netherlands: a Delphi study.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Redefining value: a discourse analysis on value-based health care.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- A Qualitative Research for Defining Meaningful Attributes for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease from the Patient Perspective.The patient · 2020Article
- Crohn's disease.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2020Review
- UEG Week 2019 Poster Presentations.United European gastroenterology journal · 2019Article
- Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Luminal Crohn's Disease.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2019Article
- Factors that Influence Treatment and Non-treatment Decision Making Among Individuals with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Integrative Review.The patient · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeValue-based healthcare is an upcoming field. The core idea is to evaluate care based on achieved outcomes divided by the costs. Unfortunately, the optimal way to evaluate outcomes is ill-defined. In this study, we aim to develop a single, preference based, outcome metric, which can be used to quantify overall health value in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
methodsIBD patients filled out a choice-based conjoint (CBC) questionnaire in which patients chose preferable outcome scenarios with different levels of disease control (DC), quality of life (QoL), and productivity (Pr). A CBC analysis was performed to estimate the relative value of DC, QoL, and Pr. A patient-centered composite score was developed which was weighted based on the stated preferences.
resultsWe included 210 IBD patients. Large differences in stated preferences were observed. Increases from low to intermediate outcome levels were valued more than increases from intermediate to high outcome levels. Overall, QoL was more important to patients than DC or Pr. Individual outcome scores were calculated based on the stated preferences. This score was significantly different from a score not weighted based on patient preferences in patients with active disease.
conclusionsWe showed the feasibility of creating a single outcome metric in IBD which incorporates patients' values using a CBC. Because this metric changes significantly when weighted according to patients' values, we propose that success in healthcare should be measured accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.