Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27582168›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2016

The epigenome: the next substrate for engineering.

Minhee Park, Albert J Keung, Ahmad S Khalil

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Mapping chromatin modifications at the single cell level.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Light-Controlled Mammalian Cells and Their Therapeutic Applications in Synthetic Biology.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Minhee ParkDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Biological Design Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Albert J KeungDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
Ahmad S KhalilDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Biological Design Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. akhalil@bu.edu.

Funding

Chromatin-Based Cellular Memory and Spatial Genomic RegulationF32GM105272 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI KEUNG, ALBERT JUN QI · 2014 to 2015
$106k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM105272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We are entering an era of epigenome engineering. The precision manipulation of chromatin and epigenetic modifications provides new ways to interrogate their influence on genome and cell function and to harness these changes for applications. We review the design and state of epigenome editing tools, highlighting the unique regulatory properties afforded by these systems.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticEpigenomicsChromatinGenome, HumanHumansChromatin

Identifiers

PMID27582168
PMCPMC5006378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.