ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2016
The Pre-Sac Reflux Test (PSRT): a new diagnostic test for presaccal stenosis/obstruction.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Soft stop on syringing and probing may have a high false-positive rate in diagnosing pre-sac obstruction.International ophthalmology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo introduce a new procedure, the Pre-Sac Reflux Test (PSRT), to screen for epiphora caused by presaccal stenosis/obstruction, and to determine the reliability of this new test in the diagnosis of presaccal stenosis/obstruction.
methodsA nonrandomized, prospective, comparative case series of 280 eyes of 140 patients with unilateral presaccal stenosis/obstruction was performed. The PSRT was performed by a masked examiner on both eyes of each patient. After fluorescein staining, the lower lid was everted and lower punctum was observed using a cobalt-blue filter under slit-lamp magnification. After blotting excess fluorescein on the punbtum, the area of lacrimal ampulla was massaged with mild pressure with an index finger. The reflux (billowing of the fluorescein-stained tear) from each lower punctum were compared, and the bilateral symmetry was measured. In the same way, reflux from each upper punctum were compared for bilateral symmetry. The PSRT was considered positive if reflux from punctum was absent, or reduced asymmetrically, compared with that from contralateral punctum. If the test of either upper or lower punctum showed positive, the eye was considered positive. The validity of PSRT was measured by sensitivity and specificity, as well as positive- and negative-predictive values.
resultsThe PSRT used to diagnose presaccal stenosis/obstruction has a sensitivity of 92.9 % and a specificity of 97.1 %. It has a positive-predictive value of 97.0 % and a negative-predictive value of 93.2 %.
conclusionsThe PSRT is a reliable screening test for diagnosis of presaccal stenosis/obstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.