Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27582044›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental neurobiology2017

A structural and functional comparison of gap junction channels composed of connexins and innexins.

I Martha Skerrett, Jamal B Williams

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental neurobiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Defining the electrical synapse.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  2. Sexually Dimorphic and Intersex-Specific Transcriptional Responses inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Controllable gap junctions by vitamin BProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The "plant neurobiology" revolution.Plant signaling & behavior · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Gap Junctions in Ctenophora.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  15. A Chemical Chaperone Restores Connexin 26 Mutant Activity.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2023
    Article
  16. Innexin-Mediated Adhesion between Glia Is Required for Axon Ensheathment in the Peripheral Nervous System.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. The origin of human epithelial tissue.Histology and histopathology · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

I Martha SkerrettBiology Department, SUNY Buffalo State, 1300 Elmwood Ave, Buffalo, New York, 14222.
Jamal B WilliamsBiology Department, SUNY Buffalo State, 1300 Elmwood Ave, Buffalo, New York, 14222.
Buffalo State University · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Investigating Connexion Interactions in SkinR15GM116089 · NIGMS · RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF SUNY AT BUFFALO STATE COLLEGE · PI SKERRETT, INGRID MARTHA · 2015 to 2015
$294k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM116089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methods such as electron microscopy and electrophysiology led to the understanding that gap junctions were dense arrays of channels connecting the intracellular environments within almost all animal tissues. The characteristics of gap junctions were remarkably similar in preparations from phylogenetically diverse animals such as cnidarians and chordates. Although few studies directly compared them, minor differences were noted between gap junctions of vertebrates and invertebrates. For instance, a slightly wider gap was noted between cells of invertebrates and the spacing between invertebrate channels was generally greater. Connexins were identified as the structural component of vertebrate junctions in the 1980s and innexins as the structural component of pre-chordate junctions in the 1990s. Despite a lack of similarity in gene sequence, connexins and innexins are remarkably similar. Innexins and connexins have the same membrane topology and form intercellular channels that play a variety of tissue- and temporally specific roles. Both protein types oligomerize to form large aqueous channels that allow the passage of ions and small metabolites and are regulated by factors such as pH, calcium, and voltage. Much more is currently known about the structure, function, and structure-function relationships of connexins. However, the innexin field is expanding. Greater knowledge of innexin channels will permit more detailed comparisons with their connexin-based counterparts, and provide insight into the ubiquitous yet specific roles of gap junctions. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Develop Neurobiol 77: 522-547, 2017.

Indexed as

ConnexinsGap JunctionsIon ChannelsAnimalsConnexinsIon Channelsconnexinfunctiongap junctioninnexinstructure

Identifiers

PMID27582044
PMCPMC5412853
OpenAlexW2515726425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.