Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27581883›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2016

Olfactory experience shapes the evaluation of odour similarity in ants: a behavioural and computational analysis.

Margot Perez, Thomas Nowotny, Patrizia d'Ettorre, Martin Giurfa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Olfactory Generalization in Detector Dogs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Margot PerezLaboratory of Experimental and Comparative Ethology (LEEC), University Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Villetaneuse, France Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Research Centre on Animal Cognition (UMR5169), Toulouse, France Research Centre on Animal Cognition (UMR5169), University Paul-Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Thomas NowotnyCentre for Computational Neuroscience and Robotics, School of Engineering and Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Patrizia d'EttorreLaboratory of Experimental and Comparative Ethology (LEEC), University Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Villetaneuse, France Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Research Centre on Animal Cognition (UMR5169), Toulouse, France Research Centre on Animal Cognition (UMR5169), University Paul-Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Martin GiurfaCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Research Centre on Animal Cognition (UMR5169), Toulouse, France Research Centre on Animal Cognition (UMR5169), University Paul-Sabatier, Toulouse, France martin.giurfa@univ-tlse3.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-7173-769X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perceptual similarity between stimuli is often assessed via generalization, the response to stimuli that are similar to the one which was previously conditioned. Although conditioning procedures are variable, studies on how this variation may affect perceptual similarity remain scarce. Here, we use a combination of behavioural and computational analyses to investigate the influence of olfactory conditioning procedures on odour generalization in ants. Insects were trained following either absolute conditioning, in which a single odour (an aldehyde) was rewarded with sucrose, or differential conditioning, in which one odour (the same aldehyde) was similarly rewarded and another odour (an aldehyde differing in carbon-chain length) was punished with quinine. The response to the trained odours and generalization to other aldehydes were assessed. We show that olfactory similarity, rather than being immutable, varies with the conditioning procedure. Compared with absolute conditioning, differential conditioning enhances olfactory discrimination. This improvement is best described by a multiplicative interaction between two independent processes, the excitatory and inhibitory generalization gradients induced by the rewarded and the punished odour, respectively. We show that olfactory similarity is dramatically shaped by an individual's perceptual experience and suggest a new hypothesis for the nature of stimulus interactions underlying experience-dependent changes in perceptual similarity.

Indexed as

OdorantsOlfactory PerceptionAldehydesAnimalsAntsAldehydesantgeneralizationgeneralization gradientolfactory learningolfactory perceptionperceptual modelling

Identifiers

PMID27581883
PMCPMC5013785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.