Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27581811›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology2016

The role of proximal versus distal stomach resection in the weight loss seen after vertical sleeve gastrectomy.

Bhushan V Kulkarni, Kathleen LaSance, Joyce E Sorrell, Lisa Lemen, Stephen C Woods, Randy J Seeley, Darleen Sandoval

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A comparison of rodent models of vertical sleeve gastrectomy.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bhushan V KulkarniDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Kathleen LaSanceDepartment of Radiology, Vontz Core Imaging Laboratory, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Joyce E SorrellDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio; and.
Lisa LemenDepartment of Radiology, Vontz Core Imaging Laboratory, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Stephen C WoodsDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Randy J SeeleyDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Darleen SandovalDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; darleens@umich.edu.
University of Cincinnati · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Regional Pilot And Feasibility Study Grants ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Mehboob A Hussain · 2013 to 2026
$24.3M
Role of Glucokinase in GLP-1 Regulation of Energy and Glucose HomeostasisR01DK082480 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SANDOVAL, DARLEEN A. · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020572NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK082480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanisms involved in the weight loss seen after vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) are not clear. The rat stomach has two morphologically and functionally distinct proximal and distal parts. The rat model for VSG involves complete removal of the proximal part and 80% removal of the distal part along the greater curvature. The purpose of this study was to understand the potential independent contributions of removal of these distinct gastric sections to VSG outcomes. We prepared four surgical groups of male Long-Evans rats: VSG, sham surgery (control), selective proximal section removal (PR), and selective distal section removal (DR). Gastric emptying rate (GER) was highest after VSG compared with all other groups. However, PR, in turn, had significantly greater GER compared with both DR and sham groups. The surgery-induced weight loss followed the same pattern with VSG causing the greatest weight loss and PR having greater weight loss compared with DR and sham groups. The results were robust for rats fed regular chow or a high-fat diet. Body mass analysis revealed that the weight loss was due to the loss of fat mass, and there was no change in lean mass after the surgeries. In conclusion, removal of the proximal stomach contributes to most, but not all, of the physiological impact of VSG.

Indexed as

GastrectomyAnimalsGastric EmptyingMaleObesityRatsRats, Long-EvansStomachTreatment OutcomeWeight Lossgastric emptying ratesleeve gastrectomyweight loss

Identifiers

PMID27581811
PMCPMC5130580
OpenAlexW2510619678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.