Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27581603›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2016

A phase I study of recombinant (r) vaccinia-CEA(6D)-TRICOM and rFowlpox-CEA(6D)-TRICOM vaccines with GM-CSF and IFN-α-2b in patients with CEA-expressing carcinomas.

Megan C Duggan, Caroline Jochems, Renee N Donahue, Jacob Richards, Volodymyr Karpa, Elizabeth Foust, Bonnie Paul, Taylor Brooks, Susheela Tridandapani, Thomas Olencki and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Targeting inflammation as cancer therapy.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. CEA vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Harnessing cytokines and chemokines for cancer therapy.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Megan C DugganComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Caroline JochemsNational Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Renee N DonahueNational Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jacob RichardsNational Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Volodymyr KarpaComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Elizabeth FoustComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Bonnie PaulComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Taylor BrooksComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Susheela TridandapaniComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Thomas OlenckiDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Xueliang PanCenter for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Gregory B LesinskiComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jeffrey SchlomNational Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Bethesda, MD, USA.
William E Carson IiiDivision of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, N924 Doan Hall, 410 W. 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. william.carson@osumc.edu.
The Ohio State University · USNational Cancer Institute · USCenter for Devices and Radiological Health · US

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
TWO SIGNAL REQUIREMENT FOR NATURAL KILLER IMMUNITYP01CA095426 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CALIGIURI, MICHAEL A · 2002 to 2016
$29.6M
Strategies for Therapeutic Cancer Vaccine Clinical TrialsZIABC010425 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SCHLOM, JEFFREY · 2009 to 2023
$13.7M
Integrative Training in Biomedical SystemsT32GM068412 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PARVIN, JEFFREY D · 2005 to 2020
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA095426NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM068412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prime-boost vaccination with recombinant (r) vaccinia(V)-CEA(6D)-TRICOM (triad of co-stimulatory molecules B7.1, ICAM-1 and LFA-3) and rFowlpox(F)-CEA(6D)-TRICOM infect antigen-presenting cells and direct expression of co-stimulatory molecules. We hypothesized that co-administration of vaccine with GM-CSF and interferon alpha (IFN-α) would have efficacy in CEA-expressing cancers. Patients with CEA-expressing cancers received the rV-CEA(6D)-TRICOM vaccine subcutaneously (s.c.) on day 1 followed by GM-CSF s.c. to the injection site on days 1-4. In Cycle 1, patients received thrice weekly s.c. injections of IFN-α-2b the week after rV-CEA(6D)-TRICOM. In Cycles 2-4, patients received thrice weekly s.c. injections of IFN-α-2b the same week that rF-CEA(6D)-TRICOM was given. The first cohort received no IFN followed by dose escalation of IFN-α in subsequent cohorts. Thirty-three patients were accrued (mean 59.8 years). Grade 3 toxicities included fatigue and hyperglycemia. Grade 4-5 adverse events (unrelated to treatment) were confusion (1), elevated aspartate transaminase (AST)/alanine transaminase (ALT) (1), and sudden death (1). No patients had a partial response, and eight patients exhibited stable disease of ≥3 months. Median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 1.8 and 6.3 months, respectively. Significantly higher serum CD27 levels were observed after vaccine therapy (p = 0.006 post 1-2 cycles, p = 0.003 post 3 cycles, p = 0.03 post 4-7 cycles) and 42 % of patients assayed developed CEA-specific T cell responses. Pre-treatment levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells correlated with overall survival (p = 0.04). Administration of IFN-α led to significantly increased OS (p = 0.02) compared to vaccine alone. While the vaccine regimen produced no clinical responses, IFN-α administration was associated with improved survival.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenCancer VaccinesCarcinoembryonic AntigenCD58 AntigensColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansHyperglycemiaIntercellular Adhesion Molecule-1Interferon-alphaMaleMiddle AgedSurvival AnalysisT-LymphocytesTreatment OutcomeB7-H1 AntigenCancer VaccinesCarcinoembryonic AntigenCD274 protein, humanCD58 AntigensGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorIntercellular Adhesion Molecule-1Interferon-alphaTumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily, Member 7Vaccines, SyntheticCarcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)Colorectal cancerImmunotherapyInterferon alpha-2bVaccines

Identifiers

PMID27581603
PMCPMC5071149
OpenAlexW2517830319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.