Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27581533›Full record

Trial reportHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2017

The efficacy and long-term safety of a triple combination of 80 mg telmisartan, 5 mg amlodipine and 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide in Japanese patients with essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind study with open-label extension.

Jitsuo Higaki, Issei Komuro, Kosuke Shiki, Hiroyuki Ugai, Atsushi Taniguchi, Hiroshi Ikeda, Daisuke Kuroki, Seiichiro Nishimura, Toshio Ogihara

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Are diuretic additives fit for uncontrolled hypertensive patients receiving telmisartan and amlodipine treatment?Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jitsuo HigakiDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology, Hypertension & Nephrology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan.
Issei KomuroDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kosuke ShikiMedical Division, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki UgaiMedical Division, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi TaniguchiMedical Division, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi IkedaMedical Division, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Daisuke KurokiMedical Division, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Seiichiro NishimuraMedical Division, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Toshio OgiharaMorinomiya University of Medical Sciences, Osaka, Japan.
Boehringer Ingelheim (Japan) · JPEhime University · JPMorinomiya University of Medical Sciences · JPThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare 80 mg telmisartan/5 mg amlodipine/12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide (T80/A5/H12.5) with 80 mg telmisartan/12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide (T80/H12.5) to determine their relative blood pressure (BP) lowering effects in essential hypertensive patients with inadequate control and to evaluate the long-term safety of T80/A5/H12.5 in a 52-week extension period. Patients (n=132) were randomly assigned to receive double-blind treatment with T80/A5/H12.5 or T80/H12.5 for 8 weeks after a 6-week run-in-period of T80/H12.5. All 126 patients who completed the double-blind period entered the 52-week open-label extension and received T80/A5/H12.5. The adjusted mean changes from the reference baseline of the trough-seated systolic and diastolic BP (SBP/DBP) at week 8 were significantly larger in the T80/A5/H12.5 group (-10.6/-8.8 mm Hg) than in the T80/H12.5 group (-2.3/-1.3 mm Hg) (P<0.0001). The BP-lowering effect of T80/A5/H12.5 was maintained over the 52-week extension period. The adverse events (AEs) during both treatment periods were generally mild. Drug-related AEs were reported in one patient in each group in the double-blind period and in five patients exposed to T80/A5/H12.5 in the double-blind and/or open-label extension period. T80/A5/H12.5 therapy was clinically and statistically superior to T80/H12.5 therapy for the reduction of BP in patients with essential hypertension uncontrolled with T80/H12.5, and its BP-lowering effect was maintained in the long term. T80/A5/H12.5 was generally well-tolerated.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsBenzimidazolesBenzoatesBlood PressureDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationEssential HypertensionFemaleHumansHydrochlorothiazideHypertensionJapanMaleAmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsBenzimidazolesBenzoatesHydrochlorothiazideTelmisartan

Identifiers

PMID27581533
PMCPMC5222993
OpenAlexW2508650268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.