Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27581462›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Mechanisms of Saccadic Suppression in Primate Cortical Area V4.

Theodoros P Zanos, Patrick J Mineault, Daniel Guitton, Christopher C Pack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Active gaze behavior organizes V1 activity in freely-moving marmosets.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Spontaneous modulations of high-frequency cortical activity.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Eye movements shape visual learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Predictive Sensing: The Role of Motor Signals in Sensory Processing.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Identification of cytokine-specific sensory neural signals by decoding murine vagus nerve activity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Theodoros P ZanosMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A2B4, Canada, Center for Bioelectronic Medicine, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York 11030, and tzanos@northwell.edu christopher.pack@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-9204-9551
Patrick J MineaultNeurobiology Department, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1763.ORCID 0000-0001-5519-842X
Daniel GuittonMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A2B4, Canada.
Christopher C PackMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A2B4, Canada, tzanos@northwell.edu christopher.pack@mcgill.ca.

Funding

CIHR MOP-115178CIHR MOP-9222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledPsychophysical studies have shown that subjects are often unaware of visual stimuli presented around the time of an eye movement. This saccadic suppression is thought to be a mechanism for maintaining perceptual stability. The brain might accomplish saccadic suppression by reducing the gain of visual responses to specific stimuli or by simply suppressing firing uniformly for all stimuli. Moreover, the suppression might be identical across the visual field or concentrated at specific points. To evaluate these possibilities, we recorded from individual neurons in cortical area V4 of nonhuman primates trained to execute saccadic eye movements. We found that both modes of suppression were evident in the visual responses of these neurons and that the two modes showed different spatial and temporal profiles: while gain changes started earlier and were more widely distributed across visual space, nonspecific suppression was found more often in the peripheral visual field, after the completion of the saccade. Peripheral suppression was also associated with increased noise correlations and stronger local field potential oscillations in the α frequency band. This pattern of results suggests that saccadic suppression shares some of the circuitry responsible for allocating voluntary attention. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: We explore our surroundings by looking at things, but each eye movement that we make causes an abrupt shift of the visual input. Why doesn't the world look like a film recorded on a shaky camera? The answer in part is a brain mechanism called saccadic suppression, which reduces the responses of visual neurons around the time of each eye movement. Here we reveal several new properties of the underlying mechanisms. First, the suppression operates differently in the central and peripheral visual fields. Second, it appears to be controlled by oscillations in the local field potentials at frequencies traditionally associated with attention. These results suggest that saccadic suppression shares the brain circuits responsible for actively ignoring irrelevant stimuli.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsAttentionEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleFourier AnalysisMacaca mulattaMaleNeuronsPhotic StimulationReaction TimeSaccadesStatistics, NonparametricVisual CortexVisual FieldsVisual PerceptionalphaLFPprimatesaccadessuppressionV4

Identifiers

PMID27581462
PMCPMC6601908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.