Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27581385›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology2016

Polycomb and trithorax opposition in development and disease.

Steven T Poynter, Cigall Kadoch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. ASXL1/2 mutations and myeloid malignancies.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The BAF complex in development and disease.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Targeting the epigenome in malignant pleural mesothelioma.Translational lung cancer research · 2017
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Steven T PoynterChemical Biology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Cigall KadochDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. cigall_kadoch@dfci.harvard.edu.

Funding

Misassembled BAF complexes in human cancer: structural and functional consequencesF31CA196218 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI POYNTER, STEVEN THOMAS · 2015 to 2018
$123k
NCI NIH HHS F31 CA196218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early discoveries in chromatin biology and epigenetics heralded new insights into organismal development. From these studies, two mediators of cellular differentiation were discovered: the Polycomb group (PcG) of transcriptional repressors, and the trithorax group (trxG) of transcriptional activators. These protein families, while opposed in function, work together to coordinate the appropriate cellular developmental programs that allow for both embryonic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Recently, both the PcG and trxG chromatin modulators have been observed to be deregulated in a wide spectrum diseases including developmental disorders and cancer. To understand the impact of these findings we outline the past, present, and future. WIREs Dev Biol 2016, 5:659-688. doi: 10.1002/wdev.244 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

Indexed as

Developmental BiologyDiseaseAnimalsHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHumansMyeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia ProteinPolycomb-Group ProteinsHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseKMT2A protein, humanMyeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia ProteinPolycomb-Group Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27581385
PMCPMC5518792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.