ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2017
Determinants of biventricular cardiac function: a mathematical model study on geometry and myofiber orientation.
Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heart in a knot: unraveling the impact of the nested tori myofiber architecture on ventricular mechanics.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2025Article
- On the possibility of estimating myocardial fiber architecture from cardiac strains.Functional imaging and modeling of the heart : ... International Workshop, FIMH ..., proceedings. FIMH (Conference) · 2023Article
- From evidence-based medicine to digital twin technology for predicting ventricular tachycardia in ischaemic cardiomyopathy.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022Article
- Comparison of interpolation methods of predominant cardiomyocyte orientation from in vivo and ex vivo cardiac diffusion tensor imaging data.NMR in biomedicine · 2022Article
- Personalization of biomechanical simulations of the left ventricle by in-vivo cardiac DTI data: Impact of fiber interpolation methods.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Multiscale simulations of left ventricular growth and remodeling.Biophysical reviews · 2021Review
- Effect of myofibre architecture on ventricular pump function by using a neonatal porcine heart model: from DT-MRI to rule-based methods.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
- Computational modeling of cardiac growth and remodeling in pressure overloaded hearts-Linking microstructure to organ phenotype.Acta biomaterialia · 2020Review
- Using Systolic Local Mechanical Load to Predict Fiber Orientation in Ventricles.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Article
- Uncertainty in cardiac myofiber orientation and stiffnesses dominate the variability of left ventricle deformation response.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2019Article
- Clinical Applications of Patient-Specific Models: The Case for a Simple Approach.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In patient-specific mathematical models of cardiac electromechanics, usually a patient-specific geometry and a generic myofiber orientation field are used as input, upon which myocardial tissue properties are tuned to clinical data. It remains unclear to what extent deviations in myofiber orientation and geometry between model and patient influence model predictions on cardiac function. Therefore, we evaluated the sensitivity of cardiac function for geometry and myofiber orientation in a biventricular (BiV) finite element model of cardiac mechanics. Starting out from a reference geometry in which myofiber orientation had no transmural component, two new geometries were defined with either a 27 % decrease in LV short- to long-axis ratio, or a 16 % decrease of RV length, but identical LV and RV cavity and wall volumes. These variations in geometry caused differences in both local myofiber and global pump work below 6 %. Variation of fiber orientation was induced through adaptive myofiber reorientation that caused an average change in fiber orientation of [Formula: see text] predominantly through the formation of a component in transmural direction. Reorientation caused a considerable increase in local myofiber work [Formula: see text] and in global pump work [Formula: see text] in all three geometries, while differences between geometries were below 5 %. The findings suggest that implementing a realistic myofiber orientation is at least as important as defining a patient-specific geometry. The model for remodeling of myofiber orientation seems a useful approach to estimate myofiber orientation in the absence of accurate patient-specific information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.