Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27581324›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2017

Determinants of biventricular cardiac function: a mathematical model study on geometry and myofiber orientation.

Marieke Pluijmert, Tammo Delhaas, Adrián Flores de la Parra, Wilco Kroon, Frits W Prinzen, Peter H M Bovendeerd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. On the possibility of estimating myocardial fiber architecture from cardiac strains.Functional imaging and modeling of the heart : ... International Workshop, FIMH ..., proceedings. FIMH (Conference) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Clinical Applications of Patient-Specific Models: The Case for a Simple Approach.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marieke PluijmertDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Tammo DelhaasDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Adrián Flores de la ParraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Wilco KroonInstitute of Computational Science, University of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland.
Frits W PrinzenDepartment of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Peter H M BovendeerdDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. p.h.m.bovendeerd@tue.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patient-specific mathematical models of cardiac electromechanics, usually a patient-specific geometry and a generic myofiber orientation field are used as input, upon which myocardial tissue properties are tuned to clinical data. It remains unclear to what extent deviations in myofiber orientation and geometry between model and patient influence model predictions on cardiac function. Therefore, we evaluated the sensitivity of cardiac function for geometry and myofiber orientation in a biventricular (BiV) finite element model of cardiac mechanics. Starting out from a reference geometry in which myofiber orientation had no transmural component, two new geometries were defined with either a 27 % decrease in LV short- to long-axis ratio, or a 16 % decrease of RV length, but identical LV and RV cavity and wall volumes. These variations in geometry caused differences in both local myofiber and global pump work below 6 %. Variation of fiber orientation was induced through adaptive myofiber reorientation that caused an average change in fiber orientation of [Formula: see text] predominantly through the formation of a component in transmural direction. Reorientation caused a considerable increase in local myofiber work [Formula: see text] and in global pump work [Formula: see text] in all three geometries, while differences between geometries were below 5 %. The findings suggest that implementing a realistic myofiber orientation is at least as important as defining a patient-specific geometry. The model for remodeling of myofiber orientation seems a useful approach to estimate myofiber orientation in the absence of accurate patient-specific information.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalHeartHumansMyocardiumVentricular FunctionAdaptationBiventricleComputational physiologyFinite element

Identifiers

PMID27581324
PMCPMC5350259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.