Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27581036›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2017

Metagenomic Analysis of Some Potential Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria in Arable Soils at Different Formation Processes.

Agnieszka Wolińska, Agnieszka Kuźniar, Urszula Zielenkiewicz, Artur Banach, Dariusz Izak, Zofia Stępniewska, Mieczysław Błaszczyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Impact ofInsects · 2025
    Article
  4. Impacts of Elevated COPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Taxonomical and functional bacterial community profiling in disease-resistant and disease-susceptible soybean cultivars.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2022
    Article
  6. Current research in microbial sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Effects of Pavement Types on Soil Bacterial Communities across Different Depths.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Agnieszka WolińskaDepartment of Biochemistry and Environmental Chemistry, Institute of Biotechnology, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 1 I Konstantynów Str, 20-708, Lublin, Poland. awolin@kul.pl.
Agnieszka KuźniarDepartment of Biochemistry and Environmental Chemistry, Institute of Biotechnology, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 1 I Konstantynów Str, 20-708, Lublin, Poland.
Urszula ZielenkiewiczDepartment of Microbial Biochemistry, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics PAS, 5a Pawińskiego Str, 02-206, Warsaw, Poland.
Artur BanachDepartment of Biochemistry and Environmental Chemistry, Institute of Biotechnology, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 1 I Konstantynów Str, 20-708, Lublin, Poland.
Dariusz IzakDepartment of Microbial Biochemistry, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics PAS, 5a Pawińskiego Str, 02-206, Warsaw, Poland.
Zofia StępniewskaDepartment of Biochemistry and Environmental Chemistry, Institute of Biotechnology, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 1 I Konstantynów Str, 20-708, Lublin, Poland.
Mieczysław BłaszczykDepartment of Microbial Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159 Str, 02-776, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main goal of the study was to determine the diversity of the potential nitrogen-fixing (PNF) bacteria inhabiting agricultural (A) soils versus wastelands serving as controls (C). The soils were classified into three groups based on the formation process: autogenic soils (Albic Luvisols, Brunic Arenosols, Haplic Phaeozem) formed on loess material, hydrogenic soils (Mollic Gleysols, Eutric Fluvisol, Eutric Histosol) formed under the effect of stagnant water and lithogenic soils (Rendzina Leptosols) formed on limestone. In order to determine the preferable conditions for PNF bacteria, the relationships between the soil chemical features and bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were tested. Additionally, the nitrogen content and fertilisation requirement of the lithogenic (LG), autogenic (AG) and hydrogenic (HG) soils were discussed. The composition of the bacterial communities was analysed with the next-generation sequencing (NGS) by the Ion Torrent™ technology. The sequences were clustered into OTU based on a 99 % similarity threshold. The arable soils tested were distinctly dominated by β-Proteobacteria representatives of PNF bacteria belonging to the genus Burkholderia. Bacteria from the α-Proteobacteria class and Devosia genus were subdominants. A free-living Cyanobacteria population dominated in A rather than in C soils. We have found that both soil agricultural management and soil formation processes are the most conducive factors for PNF bacteria, as a majority of these microorganisms inhabit the AG group of soils, whilst the LG soils with the lowest abundance of PNF bacteria revealed the need for additional mineral fertilisation. Our studies have also indicated that there are close relationships between soil classification with respect to soil formation processes and PNF bacteria preference for occupation of soil niches.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyAgricultureBiodiversityCyanobacteriaMetagenomeNitrogen-Fixing BacteriaPolandProteobacteriaSoilSoilArable soilsNext-generation sequencingNitrogen-fixing bacteriaSoil metagenomesWastelands

Identifiers

PMID27581036
PMCPMC5209426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.