Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27580941›Full record

ArticleBMJ supportive & palliative care2020

What can we learn from patients to improve their non-invasive ventilation experience? 'It was unpleasant; if I was offered it again, I would do what I was told'.

Lutz Beckert, Rachel Wiseman, Suzanne Pitama, Amanda Landers

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Indications and techniques of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in neuromuscular diseases.Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Comfort During Non-invasive Ventilation.Frontiers in medicine · 2022
    Review
  14. [Influence of nurses on the experience of noninvasive ventilation].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lutz BeckertDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2688-9325
Rachel WisemanCanterbury Respiratory Services, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Suzanne PitamaMaori/Indigenous Health Institute, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Amanda LandersDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Canterbury District Health Board · NZNurse Maude Association · NZUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesNon-invasive ventilation (NIV) is widely used as a lifesaving treatment in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; however, little is known about the patients' experience of this treatment. This study was designed to investigate the experiences and perceptions of participants using NIV. The study interprets the participants' views and explores implications for clinical practice.

methodsParticipants with respiratory failure requiring NIV were interviewed 2 weeks after discharge. A grounded theory methodology was used to order and sort the data. Theoretical sufficiency was achieved after 15 participants.

resultsFour themes emerged from the data: levels of discomfort with NIV, cognitive experiences with NIV, NIV as a life saver and concern for others. NIV was uncomfortable for participants and affected their cognition; they still reported considering NIV as a viable option for future treatment. Participants described a high level of trust in healthcare professionals and delegated decision-making to them regarding ongoing care.

conclusionsThis study provides insights into ways clinicians could improve the physical experience for patients with NIV. It also identifies a lack of recall and delegation of decision-making, highlighting the need for clinical leadership to advocate for patients.

Indexed as

AgedDecision MakingFemaleGrounded TheoryHumansMaleMiddle AgedNoninvasive VentilationPatient Acceptance of Health CarePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQualitative ResearchRespiratory InsufficiencyBiPAPCOPDNIVPatient's PerspectiveQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID27580941
PMCPMC7042975
OpenAlexW2507744712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.