ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2017
Reconstruction Method for In Vivo Bioluminescence Tomography Based on the Split Bregman Iterative and Surrogate Functions.
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-target reconstruction strategy based on blind source separation of surface measurement signals in FMT.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Filtered maximum likelihood expectation maximization based global reconstruction for bioluminescence tomography.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2018Article
- Recent methodology advances in fluorescence molecular tomography.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2018Review
- Bioluminescence tomography with structural information estimated via statistical mouse atlas registration.Biomedical optics express · 2018Article
- A new Monte Carlo code for light transport in biological tissue.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBioluminescence tomography (BLT) can provide in vivo three-dimensional (3D) images for quantitative analysis of biological processes in preclinical small animal studies, which is superior than the conventional planar bioluminescence imaging. However, to reconstruct light sources under the skin in 3D with desirable accuracy and efficiency, BLT has to face the ill-posed and ill-conditioned inverse problem. In this paper, we developed a new method for BLT reconstruction, which utilized the mathematical strategies of the split Bregman iterative and surrogate functions (SBISF) method. PROCEDURES: The proposed method considered the sparsity characteristic of the reconstructed sources. Thus, the sparsity itself was regarded as a kind of a priori information, and the sparse regularization is incorporated, which can accurately locate the position of the sources. Numerical simulation experiments of multisource cases with comparative analyses were performed to evaluate the performance of the proposed method. Then, a bead-implanted mouse and a breast cancer xenograft mouse model were employed to validate the feasibility of this method in in vivo experiments.
resultsThe results of both simulation and in vivo experiments indicated that comparing with the L1-norm iteration shrinkage method and non-monotone spectral projected gradient pursuit method, the proposed SBISF method provided the smallest position error with the least amount of time consumption.
conclusionsThe SBISF method is able to achieve high accuracy and high efficiency in BLT reconstruction and hold great potential for making BLT more practical in small animal studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.