Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27580913›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2016

Dynamic optimization of biological networks under parametric uncertainty.

Philippe Nimmegeers, Dries Telen, Filip Logist, Jan Van Impe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Compositional modelling of immune response and virus transmission dynamics.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022
    Article
  3. Applications of Coarse-Grained Models in Metabolic Engineering.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Philippe NimmegeersKU Leuven, Department of Chemical Engineering, BioTeC+ & OPTEC, Gebroeders De Smetstraat 1, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.
Dries TelenKU Leuven, Department of Chemical Engineering, BioTeC+ & OPTEC, Gebroeders De Smetstraat 1, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.
Filip LogistKU Leuven, Department of Chemical Engineering, BioTeC+ & OPTEC, Gebroeders De Smetstraat 1, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.
Jan Van ImpeKU Leuven, Department of Chemical Engineering, BioTeC+ & OPTEC, Gebroeders De Smetstraat 1, Ghent, 9000, Belgium. jan.vanimpe@kuleuven.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicro-organisms play an important role in various industrial sectors (including biochemical, food and pharmaceutical industries). A profound insight in the biochemical reactions inside micro-organisms enables an improved biochemical process control. Biological networks are an important tool in systems biology for incorporating microscopic level knowledge. Biochemical processes are typically dynamic and the cells have often more than one objective which are typically conflicting, e.g., minimizing the energy consumption while maximizing the production of a specific metabolite. Therefore multi-objective optimization is needed to compute trade-offs between those conflicting objectives. In model-based optimization, one of the inherent problems is the presence of uncertainty. In biological processes, this uncertainty can be present due to, e.g., inherent biological variability. Not taking this uncertainty into account, possibly leads to the violation of constraints and erroneous estimates of the actual objective function(s). To account for the variance in model predictions and compute a prediction interval, this uncertainty should be taken into account during process optimization. This leads to a challenging optimization problem under uncertainty, which requires a robustified solution.

resultsThree techniques for uncertainty propagation: linearization, sigma points and polynomial chaos expansion, are compared for the dynamic optimization of biological networks under parametric uncertainty. These approaches are compared in two case studies: (i) a three-step linear pathway model in which the accumulation of intermediate metabolites has to be minimized and (ii) a glycolysis inspired network model in which a multi-objective optimization problem is considered, being the minimization of the enzymatic cost and the minimization of the end time before reaching a minimum extracellular metabolite concentration. A Monte Carlo simulation procedure has been applied for the assessment of the constraint violations. For the multi-objective case study one Pareto point has been considered for the assessment of the constraint violations. However, this analysis can be performed for any Pareto point.

conclusionsThe different uncertainty propagation strategies each offer a robustified solution under parametric uncertainty. When making the trade-off between computation time and the robustness of the obtained profiles, the sigma points and polynomial chaos expansion strategies score better in reducing the percentage of constraint violations. This has been investigated for a normal and a uniform parametric uncertainty distribution. The polynomial chaos expansion approach allows to directly take prior knowledge of the parametric uncertainty distribution into account.

Indexed as

UncertaintyComputational BiologyGlycolysisModels, BiologicalSoftwareBiological networksDynamic optimizationMulti-objectiveOptimization under uncertainty

Identifiers

PMID27580913
PMCPMC5006366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.