Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27580734›Full record

ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2017

Increased Hip Stresses Resulting From a Cam Deformity and Decreased Femoral Neck-Shaft Angle During Level Walking.

K C Geoffrey Ng, Giulia Mantovani, Mario Lamontagne, Michel R Labrosse, Paul E Beaulé

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A biomechanical digital twin of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease deformity.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Femoral neck-shaft angle can predict the anterior capsular thickness in patients with femoracetabular impingement syndrome.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Hip Joint Capsular Anatomy, Mechanics, and Surgical Management.The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

K C Geoffrey NgDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Giulia MantovaniSchool of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Mario LamontagneDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Michel R LabrosseDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Paul E BeauléDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. pbeaule@toh.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is still unclear why many individuals with a cam morphology of the hip do not experience pain. It was recently reported that a decreased femoral neck-shaft angle may also be associated with hip symptoms. However, the effects that different femoral neck-shaft angles have on hip stresses in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals with cam morphology remain unclear. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We examined the effects of the cam morphology and femoral neck-shaft angle on hip stresses during walking by asking: (1) Are there differences in hip stress characteristics among symptomatic patients with cam morphology, asymptomatic individuals with cam morphology, and individuals without cam morphology? (2) What are the effects of high and low femoral neck-shaft angles on hip stresses?

methodsSix participants were selected, from a larger cohort, and their cam morphology and femoral neck-shaft angle parameters were measured from CT data. Two participants were included in one of three groups: (1) symptomatic with cam morphology; (2) asymptomatic with a cam morphology; and (3) asymptomatic control with no cam morphology with one participant having the highest femoral neck-shaft angle and the other participant having the lowest in each subgroup. Subject-specific finite element models were reconstructed and simulated during the stance phase, near pushoff, to examine maximum shear stresses on the acetabular cartilage and labrum.

resultsThe symptomatic group with cam morphology indicated high peak stresses (6.3-9.5 MPa) compared with the asymptomatic (5.9-7.0 MPa) and control groups (3.8-4.0 MPa). Differences in femoral neck-shaft angle influenced both symptomatic and asymptomatic groups; participants with the lowest femoral neck-shaft angles had higher peak stresses in their respective subgroups. There were no differences among control models.

conclusionsOur study suggests that the hips of individuals with a cam morphology and varus femoral neck angle may be subjected to higher mechanical stresses than those with a normal femoral neck angle. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Individuals with a cam morphology and decreased femoral neck-shaft angle are likely to experience severe hip stresses. Although asymptomatic participants with cam morphology had elevated stresses, a higher femoral neck-shaft angle was associated with lower stresses. Future research should examine larger amplitudes of motion to assess adverse subchondral bone stresses.

Indexed as

WalkingAdultAsymptomatic DiseasesBiomechanical PhenomenaCase-Control StudiesComputer SimulationDisease ProgressionFemoracetabular ImpingementFemur NeckFinite Element AnalysisHip JointHumansModels, BiologicalStress, MechanicalTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID27580734
PMCPMC5339115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.