Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27580188›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

BRIDES: A New Fast Algorithm and Software for Characterizing Evolving Similarity Networks Using Breakthroughs, Roadblocks, Impasses, Detours, Equals and Shortcuts.

Etienne Lord, Margaux Le Cam, Éric Bapteste, Raphaël Méheust, Vladimir Makarenkov, François-Joseph Lapointe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Etienne LordDépartement d'informatique, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Margaux Le CamDépartement de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Éric BaptesteSorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, Institut de Biologie Paris-Seine, Paris, France.
Raphaël MéheustSorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, Institut de Biologie Paris-Seine, Paris, France.
Vladimir MakarenkovDépartement d'informatique, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
François-Joseph LapointeDépartement de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Sorbonne Université · FRUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversité du Québec à Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various types of genome and gene similarity networks along with their characteristics have been increasingly used for retracing different kinds of evolutionary and ecological relationships. Here, we present a new polynomial time algorithm and the corresponding software (BRIDES) to provide characterization of different types of paths existing in evolving (or augmented) similarity networks under the constraint that such paths contain at least one node that was not present in the original network. These different paths are denoted as Breakthroughs, Roadblocks, Impasses, Detours, Equal paths, and Shortcuts. The analysis of their distribution can allow discriminating among different evolutionary hypotheses concerning genomes or genes at hand. Our approach is based on an original application of the popular shortest path Dijkstra's and Yen's algorithms. The C++ and R versions of the BRIDES program are freely available at: https://github.com/etiennelord/BRIDES.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsEvolution, MolecularSoftwareGene Regulatory NetworksGenomeSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID27580188
PMCPMC5007014
OpenAlexW2513849254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.