Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27580079›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2016

Type I IFN Signaling Is Dispensable during Secondary Viral Infection.

Martin P Hosking, Claudia T Flynn, J Lindsay Whitton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. An Overview on the Epidemiology and Immunology of COVID-19.Journal of infection and public health · 2021
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martin P HoskingDepartment of Immunology and Microbial Science, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Claudia T FlynnDepartment of Immunology and Microbial Science, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
J Lindsay WhittonDepartment of Immunology and Microbial Science, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, United States of America.

Funding

How do enteroviruses almost completely evade the attentions of CD8+ T cells?R01AI103218 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI WHITTON, J. LINDSAY · 2014 to 2017
$1.7M
mRNA as a mediator of immunological information transfer in vivoR21AI112513 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI WHITTON, J. LINDSAY · 2014 to 2015
$506k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI103218NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI112513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innate immune responses in general, and type I interferons (T1IFNs) in particular, play an important and often essential role during primary viral infections, by directly combatting the virus and by maximizing the primary adaptive immune response. Several studies have suggested that T1IFNs also contribute very substantially to the secondary (recall) response; they are thought (i) to be required to drive the early attrition of memory T cells, (ii) to support the subsequent expansion of surviving virus-specific memory cells, and (iii) to assist in the suppression and clearance of the infectious agent. However, many of these observations were predicated upon models in which T1IFN signaling was interrupted prior to a primary immune response, raising the possibility that the resulting memory cells might be intrinsically abnormal. We have directly addressed this by using an inducible-Cre model system in which the host remains genetically-intact during the primary response to infection, and in which T1IFN signaling can be effectively ablated prior to secondary viral challenge. We report that, in stark contrast to primary infection, T1IFN signaling is not required during the recall response. IFNαβR-deficient memory CD8+ and CD4+ memory T cells undergo attrition and expansion with kinetics that are indistinguishable from those of receptor-sufficient cells. Moreover, even in the absence of functional T1IFN signaling, the host's immune capacity to rapidly suppress, and then to eradicate, a secondary infection remains intact. Thus, this study shows that T1IFN signaling is dispensable during the recall response to a virus infection. Moreover, two broader implications may be drawn. First, a T cell's requirement for a cytokine is highly dependent on the cell's maturation / differentiation status. Consequently, second, these data underscore the importance of evaluating a gene's impact by modulating its expression or function in a temporally-controllable manner.

Indexed as

Immunologic MemoryAnimalsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesInterferon Type ILymphocytic ChoriomeningitisLymphocytic choriomeningitis virusMiceMice, TransgenicSignal TransductionInterferon Type I

Identifiers

PMID27580079
PMCPMC5006979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.